From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] reset: ath79: add driver Kconfig option
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:22:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472109754.3032.18.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1779401.H3WQxbgf2J@wuerfel>
Am Mittwoch, den 24.08.2016, 22:06 +0200 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Thursday, August 25, 2016 3:18:55 AM CEST Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> >
> > 2016-08-25 0:51 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
> > > On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:28:53 PM CEST Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > >> if RESET_CONTROLLER
> > >>
> > >> +config RESET_ATH79
> > >> + bool "AR71xx Reset Driver" if COMPILE_TEST
> > >> + default ATH79
> > >> + help
> > >> + This enables the ATH79 reset controller driver that supports the
> > >> + AR71xx SoC reset controller.
> > >> +
> > >>
> > >
> > > Nice series!
> > >
> > > Just note that there is one possible problem with COMPILE_TEST
> > > when the platforms are enabled, as you can then disable a driver
> > > that is normally there, and that can in turn cause problems in
> > > rare cases, e.g. when the driver has a global function that is
> > > called from platform code. I don't know if any of the drivers
> > > do that, but if they do, you'd have to use
> > >
> > > config RESET_ATH79
> > > bool "AR71xx Reset Driver" if COMPILE_TEST && !ATH79
> > > default ATH79
> > >
> > > to ensure that it's impossible to disable the driver on platforms
> > > that require it.
> >
> > Hmm,
> > Can we do this only when we really have to do so?
> > I think we should not care about such a rare case that may not happen.
> >
> > Let's start with only "if COMPILE_TEST",
> > and take a look at it if a build error is detected.
> >
> > Anyway, depending on platform code is a sign of weird implementation.
> >
> > It might be better to find a potential issue rather than hide it.
> >
> >
> >
>
> I just checked the object files in an allyesconfig build and found
> one instance:
>
> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c:extern void __init sun6i_reset_init(void);
> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c: sun6i_reset_init();
> drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c:void __init sun6i_reset_init(void)
>
> We should definitely make sure this one is handled right, and maybe
> check the source code for other instances.
I'll add "&& !ARCH_SUNXI" to the RESET_SUNXI symbol
The only other drivers that have __init symbols are the STiH4xx reset
drivers, which I haven't touched yet: STIH4xx_RESET symbols are already
selected by their respective SOC_STIH4xx under ARCH_STI. And the hi6220
driver, which doesn't have a user yet.
regards
Philipp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-25 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-24 13:28 [PATCH 01/10] reset: ath79: add driver Kconfig option Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 02/10] reset: berlin: " Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 17:43 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 03/10] reset: lpc18xx: " Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 17:43 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-24 20:32 ` Joachim Eastwood
2016-08-25 7:22 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 04/10] reset: meson: " Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 13:30 ` Neil Armstrong
2016-08-24 17:43 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 05/10] reset: pistachio: " Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 17:44 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-29 20:40 ` James Hartley
2016-08-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 06/10] reset: socfpga: " Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 15:26 ` Dinh Nguyen
2016-08-25 7:23 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 17:44 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-24 13:28 ` [PATCH 07/10] reset: stm32: " Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 17:44 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-24 13:29 ` [PATCH 08/10] reset: sunxi: " Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 17:45 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-24 13:29 ` [PATCH 09/10] reset: zynq: " Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 17:48 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-25 1:08 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-25 7:23 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-08-25 7:31 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-25 7:51 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 13:29 ` [PATCH 10/10] reset: hi6220: allow to compile test driver on other architectures Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 18:00 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-25 7:23 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 15:51 ` [PATCH 01/10] reset: ath79: add driver Kconfig option Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-24 18:18 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-24 20:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-25 2:43 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-25 7:22 ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2016-08-25 7:27 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-25 7:51 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-08-24 17:42 ` Masahiro Yamada
2016-08-25 10:31 ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-25 10:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-25 10:57 ` Philipp Zabel
2016-08-25 11:10 ` Alban
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1472109754.3032.18.camel@pengutronix.de \
--to=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).