public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] mtd: nand: sunxi: fix OOB handling in ->write_xxx() functions
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:59:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472478.qiY0UY0ao8@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442220063-7520-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

On Monday 14 September 2015 10:41:03 Boris Brezillon wrote:
>                 /* Fill OOB data in */
> -               if (oob_required) {
> -                       tmp = 0xffffffff;
> -                       memcpy_toio(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_USER_DATA_BASE, &tmp,
> -                                   4);
> -               } else {
> -                       memcpy_toio(nfc->regs + NFC_REG_USER_DATA_BASE,
> -                                   chip->oob_poi + offset - mtd->writesize,
> -                                   4);
> -               }
> +               writel(NFC_BUF_TO_USER_DATA(chip->oob_poi +
> +                                           layout->oobfree[i].offset),
> +                      nfc->regs + NFC_REG_USER_DATA_BASE);

This looks like you are changing the endianess of the data that gets written.
Is that intentional?

memcpy_toio() uses the same endianess for source and destination, while writel()
assumes that the destination is a little-endian register, and that could break
if the kernel is built to run as big-endian. I also see that sunxi_nfc_write_buf()
uses memcpy_toio() for writing the actual data, and you are not changing that.

If all hardware can do 32-bit accesses here and the size is guaranteed to be a
multiple of four bytes, you can probably improve performance by using a
__raw_writel() loop there. Using __raw_writel() in general is almost always
a bug, but here it actually makes sense. See also the powerpc implementation
of _memcpy_toio().

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-14  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-14  8:41 [PATCH v4] mtd: nand: sunxi: fix OOB handling in ->write_xxx() functions Boris Brezillon
2015-09-14  8:59 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-09-14  9:41   ` Boris Brezillon
2015-09-14 11:49     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-14 12:36       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-09-14 17:02 ` Brian Norris
2015-09-21 20:43   ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1472478.qiY0UY0ao8@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox