From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: Always consider IRQ0 as an error
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 18:25:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1473182715-18953-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> (raw)
As declared by the chief penguin, and enforced by the NO_IRQ brigade,
IRQ0 doesn't exist, and is considered as an error (no irq).
Unfortunately, the arm_pmu driver still considers it as valid in
a large number of cases. Let's fix this.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index f5e1008..2c2754a 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static void cpu_pmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
irqs = min(pmu_device->num_resources, num_possible_cpus());
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
- if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
+ if (irq > 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
on_each_cpu_mask(&cpu_pmu->supported_cpus,
cpu_pmu_disable_percpu_irq, &irq, 1);
free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static void cpu_pmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs))
continue;
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
- if (irq >= 0)
+ if (irq > 0)
free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
}
}
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ static int cpu_pmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu, irq_handler_t handler)
}
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
- if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
+ if (irq > 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu",
&hw_events->percpu_pmu);
if (err) {
@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ static int of_pmu_irq_cfg(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
/* Check the IRQ type and prohibit a mix of PPIs and SPIs */
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
- if (irq >= 0) {
+ if (irq > 0) {
bool spi = !irq_is_percpu(irq);
if (i > 0 && spi != using_spi) {
@@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ static int of_pmu_irq_cfg(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
if (cpumask_weight(&pmu->supported_cpus) == 0) {
int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
+ if (irq > 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
/* If using PPIs, check the affinity of the partition */
int ret;
--
2.1.4
reply other threads:[~2016-09-06 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1473182715-18953-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).