From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V5 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:31:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1477283492-26657-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1477283492-26657-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
We do not want to store the SCI penalty in the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]
table because acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] only holds ISA IRQ penalties and
there's no guarantee that the SCI is an ISA IRQ. We add in the SCI
penalty as a special case in acpi_irq_get_penalty().
But if we called acpi_penalize_isa_irq() or acpi_irq_penalty_update()
for an SCI that happened to be an ISA IRQ, they stored the SCI
penalty (part of the acpi_irq_get_penalty() return value) in
acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]. Subsequent calls to acpi_irq_get_penalty()
returned a penalty that included *two* SCI penalties.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
index c983bf7..6229b02 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
continue;
if (used)
- new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
+ new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +
PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
else
new_penalty = 0;
@@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
{
if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty)))
- acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
+ acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] +=
(active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-24 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-24 4:31 [PATCH V5 0/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: revert penalty calculation for ISA and SCI interrupts Sinan Kaya
2016-10-24 4:31 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2016-10-24 4:46 ` [PATCH V5 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages Jonathan Liu
2016-10-24 4:31 ` [PATCH V5 2/3] ACPI: pci_link: penalize SCI correctly Sinan Kaya
2016-10-24 4:46 ` Jonathan Liu
2016-10-24 4:31 ` [PATCH V5 3/3] ACPI: pci_link: Include PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING for ISA IRQs Sinan Kaya
2016-10-24 4:46 ` Jonathan Liu
2016-10-26 18:34 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-27 10:31 ` [PATCH V5 0/3] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: revert penalty calculation for ISA and SCI interrupts Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1477283492-26657-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).