From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: percpu: kill off final ACCESS_ONCE() uses
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 18:17:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1478283426-6649-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
For several reasons it is preferable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() rather than
ACCESS_ONCE(). For example, these handle aggregate types, result in shorter
source code, and better document the intended access (which may be useful for
instrumentation features such as the upcoming KTSAN).
Over a number of patches, most uses of ACCESS_ONCE() in arch/arm64 have been
migrated to {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(). For consistency, and the above reasons, this
patch migrates the final remaining uses.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
index 5394c84..4afb6fc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
@@ -101,16 +101,16 @@ static inline unsigned long __percpu_read(void *ptr, int size)
switch (size) {
case 1:
- ret = ACCESS_ONCE(*(u8 *)ptr);
+ ret = READ_ONCE(*(u8 *)ptr);
break;
case 2:
- ret = ACCESS_ONCE(*(u16 *)ptr);
+ ret = READ_ONCE(*(u16 *)ptr);
break;
case 4:
- ret = ACCESS_ONCE(*(u32 *)ptr);
+ ret = READ_ONCE(*(u32 *)ptr);
break;
case 8:
- ret = ACCESS_ONCE(*(u64 *)ptr);
+ ret = READ_ONCE(*(u64 *)ptr);
break;
default:
BUILD_BUG();
@@ -123,16 +123,16 @@ static inline void __percpu_write(void *ptr, unsigned long val, int size)
{
switch (size) {
case 1:
- ACCESS_ONCE(*(u8 *)ptr) = (u8)val;
+ WRITE_ONCE(*(u8 *)ptr, (u8)val);
break;
case 2:
- ACCESS_ONCE(*(u16 *)ptr) = (u16)val;
+ WRITE_ONCE(*(u16 *)ptr, (u16)val);
break;
case 4:
- ACCESS_ONCE(*(u32 *)ptr) = (u32)val;
+ WRITE_ONCE(*(u32 *)ptr, (u32)val);
break;
case 8:
- ACCESS_ONCE(*(u64 *)ptr) = (u64)val;
+ WRITE_ONCE(*(u64 *)ptr, (u64)val);
break;
default:
BUILD_BUG();
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2016-11-04 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-04 18:17 Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-11-07 1:44 ` [PATCH] arm64: percpu: kill off final ACCESS_ONCE() uses Dmitry Vyukov
2016-11-09 17:16 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1478283426-6649-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).