From: joerg.krause@embedded.rocks (Jörg Krause)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: mmc: core: complete/wait_for_completion performance
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:10:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479669034.1975.1.camel@embedded.rocks> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <187975187.249177.bccdc17e-e9c6-48c2-aeaf-3b81f1b61ec7.open-xchange@email.1und1.de>
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 16:44 +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks> hat am 20. November 2016
> > um 15:42
> > geschrieben:
> >
> >
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 14:28 +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > > Hi J?rg,
> > >
> > > > J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks> hat am 20. November
> > > > 2016
> > > > um 13:27
> > > > geschrieben:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I started the discussion on this mailing list in another thread
> > > > [1],
> > > > but I'd like to move it to a new thread, because it might be
> > > > mmc
> > > > specific.
> > > >
> > > > The issue is that I am noticed low wifi network throughput on
> > > > an
> > > > i.MX28
> > > > board with the mainline kernel (v4.7.10, about 6 Mbps) compared
> > > > to
> > > > the
> > > > vendor kernel (Freescale v2.6.35.3, about 20 Mbps). The wifi
> > > > chip
> > > > is
> > > > attached using the SDIO interface.
> > > >
> > > > I started investigation where the bottleneck in the mainline
> > > > kernel?might come from. Therefore I checked that the configs
> > > > and
> > > > settings for the interfaces and drivers are the same. They are.
> > >
> > > so you're not using the mxs_defconfig settings anymore?
> >
> > No, I changed the settings.
> >
>
> What happens to performance to if you change the following settings
> to the same
> like in mxs_defconfig?
>
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
> CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED="noop"
No much change at all. The time difference between complete() and
wait_for_complete() decreases in best case to 110 us, but also varies
to above 130 us.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-20 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-20 12:27 mmc: core: complete/wait_for_completion performance Jörg Krause
2016-11-20 13:28 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-11-20 14:42 ` Jörg Krause
2016-11-20 15:44 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-11-20 19:10 ` Jörg Krause [this message]
2016-11-26 19:10 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-12-07 7:29 ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-07 7:32 ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-07 19:23 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-12-14 9:03 ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-14 18:57 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-12-15 13:50 ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-15 18:51 ` Stefan Wahren
2016-12-16 10:06 ` Jörg Krause
2016-12-26 23:03 ` Stefan Wahren
[not found] ` <1484512950.2026.4.camel@embedded.rocks>
2017-01-15 21:08 ` Stefan Wahren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1479669034.1975.1.camel@embedded.rocks \
--to=joerg.krause@embedded.rocks \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).