From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ck.hu@mediatek.com (CK Hu) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:05:11 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v10 09/13] drm/mediatek: add mipi_tx data rate check In-Reply-To: <1480070076-6196-10-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> References: <1480070076-6196-1-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> <1480070076-6196-10-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> Message-ID: <1480503911.13978.12.camel@mtksdaap41> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, YT: On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 18:34 +0800, YT Shen wrote: > modify data rate limitation (>lGbps/lane) for mipitx > I think MT2701 DRM can work correctly without this patch. Why do you put this patch in MT2701 series? Maybe you can send this patch independently. Regards, CK > Signed-off-by: shaoming chen > Signed-off-by: YT Shen > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c > index fd84914..1ef00ac 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mipi_tx.c > @@ -177,7 +177,9 @@ static int mtk_mipi_tx_pll_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw) > > dev_dbg(mipi_tx->dev, "prepare: %u Hz\n", mipi_tx->data_rate); > > - if (mipi_tx->data_rate >= 500000000) { > + if (mipi_tx->data_rate > 1250000000) { > + return -EINVAL; > + } else if (mipi_tx->data_rate >= 500000000) { > txdiv = 1; > txdiv0 = 0; > txdiv1 = 0;