From: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com>,
Alexey Charkov <alchark@flipper.net>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexey Charkov <alchark@flipper.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_sai: Set slot width for non-TDM mode
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 20:56:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14828456.uLZWGnKmhe@workhorse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260318-sai-slot-width-v1-1-1f68186f71e3@flipper.net>
On Wednesday, 18 March 2026 15:50:25 Central European Standard Time Alexey Charkov wrote:
> Currently the slot width in non-TDM mode is always kept at the POR value
> of 32 bits, regardless of the sample width, which doesn't work well for
> some codecs such as NAU8822.
>
> Set the slot width according to the sample width in non-TDM mode, which
> is what other CPU DAI drivers do.
>
> Tested on the following RK3576 configurations:
> - SAI2 + NAU8822 (codec as the clock master), custom board
> - SAI1 + ES8388 (codec as the clock master), RK3576 EVB1
> - SAI2 + RT5616 (SAI as the clock master), FriendlyElec NanoPi M5
>
> NAU8822 didn't work prior to this patch but works after the patch. Other
> two configurations work both before and after the patch.
>
> Fixes: cc78d1eaabad ("ASoC: rockchip: add Serial Audio Interface (SAI) driver")
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Charkov <alchark@flipper.net>
> ---
> sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sai.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sai.c b/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sai.c
> index 1bf614dbdf4d..ed393e5034a4 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sai.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_sai.c
> @@ -628,6 +628,10 @@ static int rockchip_sai_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>
> regmap_update_bits(sai->regmap, reg, SAI_XCR_VDW_MASK | SAI_XCR_CSR_MASK, val);
>
> + if (!sai->is_tdm)
> + regmap_update_bits(sai->regmap, reg, SAI_XCR_SBW_MASK,
> + SAI_XCR_SBW(params_physical_width(params)));
> +
> regmap_read(sai->regmap, reg, &val);
>
> slot_width = SAI_XCR_SBW_V(val);
>
> ---
> base-commit: 8e5a478b6d6a5bb0a3d52147862b15e4d826af19
> change-id: 20260318-sai-slot-width-378eed5c22cd
>
> Best regards,
>
Thanks for the patch! Looking at where else this reg mask is used, I
got curious about `rockchip_sai_set_tdm_slot`. It seems to reset
SAI_XCR_SBW back to 32 when something calls it with 0 slots. Do we
have to adjust this as well there?
I think what we're running into here is the difference between I2S
normal mode, and I2S justified mode. In justified modes, it'd be
normal to have a slot bit width of 32 but a valid data width of, say,
16. In that case, VDJ would specify whether something is left or right
justified as far as I can tell.
So basically I'm wondering if we've accidentally been sending
I2S left-justified data all along when using SND_SOC_DAIFMT_I2S,
and whether we should only be setting this in SND_SOC_DAIFMT_I2S.
Either way, I can give this a
Tested-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
for ES8388 on my ROCK 4D (with my enablement patches for it there
on top that I need to get back around to).
Kind regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-18 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-18 14:50 [PATCH] ASoC: rockchip: rockchip_sai: Set slot width for non-TDM mode Alexey Charkov
2026-03-18 16:17 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-18 16:52 ` Alexey Charkov
2026-03-18 19:56 ` Nicolas Frattaroli [this message]
2026-03-26 14:58 ` Alexey Charkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14828456.uLZWGnKmhe@workhorse \
--to=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=alchark@flipper.net \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox