Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround on Tegra264
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:06:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14839890-3509-47b0-97d4-6c7379079452@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alB0VfK5n3PsE8oK@nvidia.com>



On 7/10/2026 9:55 AM, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 09:56:09AM +0000, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
>> Nvidia Tegra264 SMMU is affected by an erratum where a TLB entry can
>> survive an invalidation that races with concurrent traffic targeting
>> the same entry. The hardware-recommended software workaround is to
>> issue every CFGI/TLBI command (each followed by CMD_SYNC) twice, and
>> that infrastructure is already in place behind
>> arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key.
>>
>> Neither IDR nor IIDR flags this Tegra264-specific bug, so hardware
>> detection is not possible. Tegra264 is device-tree-only (no ACPI/IORT
>> support) and already has a dedicated "nvidia,tegra264-smmu" compatible,
>> so DT-probe is the only viable detection path.
>>
>> Enable the workaround on instances matching the existing
>> "nvidia,tegra264-smmu" compatible by calling static_branch_enable() on
>> arm_smmu_erratum_repeat_tlbi_cfgi_key. Document the erratum in
>> Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
>
> Sashiko pointed out a concern at PATCH-3 regarding the static key:
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260709095613.831769-1-amhetre%40nvidia.com
>
> It's a false positive. But perhaps we could fold in an inline note;
> it'd belong to the missing description that I commented in PATCH-2.
>
> Nicolin

Ack, I will address this in v6.

Thanks,
Ashish Mhetre


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-10  6:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09  9:56 [PATCH v5 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Factor out CMDQ batch force-sync conditions Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-09  9:56 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround infrastructure Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-10  4:20   ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-10  6:35     ` Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-09  9:56 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable CFGI/TLBI-repeat workaround on Tegra264 Ashish Mhetre
2026-07-10  4:25   ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-10  6:36     ` Ashish Mhetre [this message]
2026-07-10  4:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Factor out CMDQ batch force-sync conditions Nicolin Chen
2026-07-10  6:39   ` Ashish Mhetre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14839890-3509-47b0-97d4-6c7379079452@nvidia.com \
    --to=amhetre@nvidia.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox