From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:21:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 09/14] mtd: nand: sunxi: simplify optional reset handling In-Reply-To: <20170130134427.14487373@bbrezillon> References: <20170130114116.22089-1-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <20170130114116.22089-9-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <20170130134427.14487373@bbrezillon> Message-ID: <1485883318.29355.2.camel@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 13:44 +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Philipp, > > On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:41:11 +0100 > Philipp Zabel wrote: > > > As of commit bb475230b8e5 ("reset: make optional functions really > > optional"), the reset framework API calls use NULL pointers to describe > > optional, non-present reset controls. > > > > This allows to return errors from devm_reset_control_get_optional and to > > call reset_control_(de)assert unconditionally. > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel > > Cc: Icenowy Zheng > > Cc: Maxime Ripard > > Cc: Boris Brezillon > > I didn't find commit bb475230b8e5 in mainline, so I guess you plan to > take this patch in your own tree. Let me know if this is not the case. > > Acked-by: Boris Brezillon Thanks, I plan to resend this once bb475230b8e5 hits mainline, for you to merge. regards Philipp