From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rick.chang@mediatek.com (Rick Chang) Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:10:47 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder In-Reply-To: <267403e5-18ac-0c74-10ca-cc36b909dfb4@gmail.com> References: <1479353915-5043-1-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479353915-5043-4-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479784905.8964.15.camel@mtksdaap41> <1479866054.8964.21.camel@mtksdaap41> <1479894203.8964.29.camel@mtksdaap41> <1483670099.18931.5.camel@mtksdaap41> <974d20f3-5133-0869-2a35-c1617bec5d6e@xs4all.nl> <1484011718.10361.7.camel@mtksdaap41> <267403e5-18ac-0c74-10ca-cc36b909dfb4@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1486606247.4093.9.camel@mtksdaap41> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Hans, All the dependences of this patch have been merged into v4.10-next.Could you take v9 of this patch set? Matthias will help us to take the dts part. Best Regards, Rick On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 16:02 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > Hi James, > > On 10/01/17 02:28, Eddie Huang wrote: > > Hi Matthias, > > > > On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 19:45 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > >> > >> On 09/01/17 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote: > >>> Hi Rick, > >>> > >>> On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote: > >>>> Hi Hans, > >>>> > >>>> The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you have > >>>> any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could merge > >>>> the source code and dt-binding first? > >>> > >>> Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is the reason > >>> it hasn't been merged yet? > >>> > >>> If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging this media > >>> patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro can handle. > >>> > >>> If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until it is > >>> merged. > >>> > >> > >> I can't take [2] because there is no scpsys in the dts present. It seems > >> that it got never posted. > >> > >> Rick can you please follow-up with James and provide a patch which adds > >> a scpsys node to the mt2701.dtsi? > >> > > > > James sent three MT2701 dts patches [1] two weeks ago, these three > > patches include scpsys node. Please take a reference. And We will send > > new MT2701 ionmmu/smi dtsi node patch base on [1] later, thus you can > > accept and merge to 4.11. > > > > Thanks for the clarification. I pulled all this patches into > v4.10-next/dts32 > > Hans will you take v9 of this patch set? > Then I'll take the dts patch. > > Regards, > Matthias > > > [1] > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489991/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489985/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489989/ > > > > Thanks, > > Eddie > > > >