From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:18:24 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 00/35] treewide trivial patches converting pr_warning to pr_warn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1487870304.14159.29.camel@perches.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:28 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > > There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older > > pr_warning in the kernel source tree. > > > > Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files. > > > > This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate > > define pr_warning for that directory tree and pr_warn is > > not used in tools/. > > > > Done with 'sed s/\bpr_warning\b/pr_warn/' and some emacsing. [] > Where's the removal of pr_warning so we don't have more sneak in? After all of these actually get applied, and maybe a cycle or two later, one would get sent.