linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 18/41] arm64/sve: signal: Restore FPSIMD/SVE state in rt_sigreturn
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:50:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490194274-30569-19-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490194274-30569-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

This patch adds the missing logic to restore the SVE state in
rt_sigreturn.

Because the FPSIMD and SVE state alias, this code replaces the
existing fpsimd restore code when there is SVE state to restore.

For Zn[127:0], the saved FPSIMD state in Vn takes precedence.

Since __task_fpsimd_to_sve() is used to merge the FPSIMD and SVE
state back together, and only for this purpose, we don't want it to
zero out the SVE state -- hence delete the memset() from there.

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c |  4 ---
 arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index 1bdf7f2..952dd20 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -113,7 +113,6 @@ static void __fpsimd_to_sve(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int vq)
 	struct fpsimd_state *fst = &task->thread.fpsimd_state;
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	memset(sst, 0, sizeof(*sst));
 	for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i)
 		sst->zregs[i][0] = fst->vregs[i];
 }
@@ -288,9 +287,6 @@ void fpsimd_preserve_current_state(void)
 
 void fpsimd_signal_preserve_current_state(void)
 {
-	WARN_ONCE(elf_hwcap & HWCAP_SVE,
-		  "SVE state save/restore around signals doesn't work properly, expect userspace corruption!\n");
-
 	fpsimd_preserve_current_state();
 	sve_to_fpsimd(current);
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
index 6b83917..9d4f7c8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -211,6 +211,11 @@ static int restore_fpsimd_context(struct fpsimd_context __user *ctx)
 }
 
 
+struct user_ctxs {
+	struct fpsimd_context __user *fpsimd;
+	struct sve_context __user *sve;
+};
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE
 
 static int preserve_sve_context(struct sve_context __user *ctx)
@@ -240,19 +245,68 @@ static int preserve_sve_context(struct sve_context __user *ctx)
 	return err ? -EFAULT : 0;
 }
 
+static int __restore_sve_fpsimd_context(struct user_ctxs *user,
+					unsigned int vl, unsigned int vq)
+{
+	int err;
+	struct fpsimd_sve_state(vq) *task_sve_regs =
+		__sve_state(current);
+	struct fpsimd_state fpsimd;
+
+	if (vl != sve_get_vl())
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	BUG_ON(SVE_SIG_REGS_SIZE(vq) > sizeof(*task_sve_regs));
+	BUG_ON(round_up(SVE_SIG_REGS_SIZE(vq), 16) < sizeof(*task_sve_regs));
+	BUG_ON(SVE_SIG_FFR_OFFSET(vq) - SVE_SIG_REGS_OFFSET !=
+	       (char *)&task_sve_regs->ffr - (char *)task_sve_regs);
+	err = __copy_from_user(task_sve_regs,
+			       (char __user const *)user->sve +
+					SVE_SIG_REGS_OFFSET,
+			       SVE_SIG_REGS_SIZE(vq));
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	/* copy the FP and status/control registers */
+	/* restore_sigframe() already checked that user->fpsimd != NULL. */
+	err = __copy_from_user(fpsimd.vregs, user->fpsimd->vregs,
+			       sizeof(fpsimd.vregs));
+	__get_user_error(fpsimd.fpsr, &user->fpsimd->fpsr, err);
+	__get_user_error(fpsimd.fpcr, &user->fpsimd->fpcr, err);
+
+	/* load the hardware registers from the fpsimd_state structure */
+	if (!err)
+		fpsimd_update_current_state(&fpsimd);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int restore_sve_fpsimd_context(struct user_ctxs *user)
+{
+	int err;
+	u16 vl, vq;
+
+	err = __get_user(vl, &user->sve->vl);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	if (!sve_vl_valid(vl))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	vq = sve_vq_from_vl(vl);
+
+	return __restore_sve_fpsimd_context(user, vl, vq);
+}
+
 #else /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
 
-/* Turn any non-optimised out attempt to use this into a link error: */
+/* Turn any non-optimised out attempts to use these into a link error: */
 extern int preserve_sve_context(void __user *ctx);
+extern int restore_sve_fpsimd_context(struct user_ctxs *user);
 
 #endif /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
 
 
-struct user_ctxs {
-	struct fpsimd_context __user *fpsimd;
-	struct sve_context __user *sve;
-};
-
 static int parse_user_sigframe(struct user_ctxs *user,
 			       struct rt_sigframe __user *sf)
 {
@@ -316,6 +370,9 @@ static int parse_user_sigframe(struct user_ctxs *user,
 			if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SVE))
 				goto invalid;
 
+			if (!(elf_hwcap & HWCAP_SVE))
+				goto invalid;
+
 			if (user->sve)
 				goto invalid;
 
@@ -375,9 +432,6 @@ static int parse_user_sigframe(struct user_ctxs *user,
 	}
 
 done:
-	if (!user->fpsimd)
-		goto invalid;
-
 	return 0;
 
 invalid:
@@ -411,8 +465,19 @@ static int restore_sigframe(struct pt_regs *regs,
 	if (err == 0)
 		err = parse_user_sigframe(&user, sf);
 
-	if (err == 0)
-		err = restore_fpsimd_context(user.fpsimd);
+	if (err == 0) {
+		if (!user.fpsimd)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		if (user.sve) {
+			if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SVE) ||
+			    !(elf_hwcap & HWCAP_SVE))
+				return -EINVAL;
+
+			err = restore_sve_fpsimd_context(&user);
+		} else
+			err = restore_fpsimd_context(user.fpsimd);
+	}
 
 	return err;
 }
-- 
2.1.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-22 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-22 14:50 [RFC PATCH v2 00/41] Scalable Vector Extension (SVE) core support Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/41] arm64: signal: Refactor sigcontext parsing in rt_sigreturn Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/41] arm64: signal: factor frame layout and population into separate passes Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/41] arm64: signal: factor out signal frame record allocation Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/41] arm64: signal: Allocate extra sigcontext space as needed Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/41] arm64: signal: Parse extra_context during sigreturn Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/41] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/41] arm64/sve: Allow kernel-mode NEON to be disabled in Kconfig Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/41] arm64/sve: Low-level save/restore code Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/41] arm64/sve: Boot-time feature detection and reporting Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/41] arm64/sve: Boot-time feature enablement Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/41] arm64/sve: Expand task_struct for Scalable Vector Extension state Dave Martin
2017-03-22 16:20   ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 10:49     ` Dave Martin
2017-03-23 11:26       ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/41] arm64/sve: Save/restore SVE state on context switch paths Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/41] arm64/sve: [BROKEN] Basic support for KERNEL_MODE_NEON Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/41] Revert "arm64/sve: Allow kernel-mode NEON to be disabled in Kconfig" Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/41] arm64/sve: Restore working FPSIMD save/restore around signals Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/41] arm64/sve: signal: Add SVE state record to sigcontext Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/41] arm64/sve: signal: Dump Scalable Vector Extension registers to user stack Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/41] arm64/sve: Avoid corruption when replacing the SVE state Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/41] arm64/sve: traps: Add descriptive string for SVE exceptions Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/41] arm64/sve: Enable SVE on demand for userspace Dave Martin
2017-03-22 16:48   ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 11:24     ` Dave Martin
2017-03-23 11:30       ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-03-23 11:52         ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 12:07           ` Dave Martin
2017-03-23 13:40             ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 13:45               ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/41] arm64/sve: Implement FPSIMD-only context for tasks not using SVE Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/41] arm64/sve: Move ZEN handling to the common task_fpsimd_load() path Dave Martin
2017-03-22 16:55   ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 11:52     ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/41] arm64/sve: Discard SVE state on system call Dave Martin
2017-03-22 17:03   ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 11:59     ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/41] arm64/sve: Avoid preempt_disable() during sigreturn Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/41] arm64/sve: Avoid stale user register state after SVE access exception Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/41] arm64/sve: ptrace support Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/41] arm64: KVM: Treat SVE use by guests as undefined instruction execution Dave Martin
2017-03-22 17:06   ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 12:10     ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/41] prctl: Add skeleton for PR_SVE_{SET, GET}_VL controls Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/41] arm64/sve: Track vector length for each task Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/41] arm64/sve: Set CPU vector length to match current task Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/41] arm64/sve: Factor out clearing of tasks' SVE regs Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/41] arm64/sve: Wire up vector length control prctl() calls Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/41] arm64/sve: Disallow VL setting for individual threads by default Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 35/41] arm64/sve: Add vector length inheritance control Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 36/41] arm64/sve: ptrace: Wire up vector length control and reporting Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 37/41] arm64/sve: Enable default vector length control via procfs Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 38/41] arm64/sve: Detect SVE via the cpufeature framework Dave Martin
2017-03-23 14:11   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-03-23 14:37     ` Dave Martin
2017-03-23 14:43       ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 39/41] arm64/sve: Migrate to cpucap based detection for runtime SVE code Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 40/41] arm64/sve: Allocate task SVE context storage dynamically Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 41/41] arm64/sve: Documentation: Add overview of the SVE userspace ABI Dave Martin
2017-03-31 15:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/41] Scalable Vector Extension (SVE) core support Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-03  9:45   ` Dave Martin
2017-04-03 10:01     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-03 10:51       ` Dave Martin
2017-04-03 10:55         ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1490194274-30569-19-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).