From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 18/41] arm64/sve: signal: Restore FPSIMD/SVE state in rt_sigreturn
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:50:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490194274-30569-19-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490194274-30569-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
This patch adds the missing logic to restore the SVE state in
rt_sigreturn.
Because the FPSIMD and SVE state alias, this code replaces the
existing fpsimd restore code when there is SVE state to restore.
For Zn[127:0], the saved FPSIMD state in Vn takes precedence.
Since __task_fpsimd_to_sve() is used to merge the FPSIMD and SVE
state back together, and only for this purpose, we don't want it to
zero out the SVE state -- hence delete the memset() from there.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 4 ---
arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
index 1bdf7f2..952dd20 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
@@ -113,7 +113,6 @@ static void __fpsimd_to_sve(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int vq)
struct fpsimd_state *fst = &task->thread.fpsimd_state;
unsigned int i;
- memset(sst, 0, sizeof(*sst));
for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i)
sst->zregs[i][0] = fst->vregs[i];
}
@@ -288,9 +287,6 @@ void fpsimd_preserve_current_state(void)
void fpsimd_signal_preserve_current_state(void)
{
- WARN_ONCE(elf_hwcap & HWCAP_SVE,
- "SVE state save/restore around signals doesn't work properly, expect userspace corruption!\n");
-
fpsimd_preserve_current_state();
sve_to_fpsimd(current);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
index 6b83917..9d4f7c8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c
@@ -211,6 +211,11 @@ static int restore_fpsimd_context(struct fpsimd_context __user *ctx)
}
+struct user_ctxs {
+ struct fpsimd_context __user *fpsimd;
+ struct sve_context __user *sve;
+};
+
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE
static int preserve_sve_context(struct sve_context __user *ctx)
@@ -240,19 +245,68 @@ static int preserve_sve_context(struct sve_context __user *ctx)
return err ? -EFAULT : 0;
}
+static int __restore_sve_fpsimd_context(struct user_ctxs *user,
+ unsigned int vl, unsigned int vq)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct fpsimd_sve_state(vq) *task_sve_regs =
+ __sve_state(current);
+ struct fpsimd_state fpsimd;
+
+ if (vl != sve_get_vl())
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ BUG_ON(SVE_SIG_REGS_SIZE(vq) > sizeof(*task_sve_regs));
+ BUG_ON(round_up(SVE_SIG_REGS_SIZE(vq), 16) < sizeof(*task_sve_regs));
+ BUG_ON(SVE_SIG_FFR_OFFSET(vq) - SVE_SIG_REGS_OFFSET !=
+ (char *)&task_sve_regs->ffr - (char *)task_sve_regs);
+ err = __copy_from_user(task_sve_regs,
+ (char __user const *)user->sve +
+ SVE_SIG_REGS_OFFSET,
+ SVE_SIG_REGS_SIZE(vq));
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ /* copy the FP and status/control registers */
+ /* restore_sigframe() already checked that user->fpsimd != NULL. */
+ err = __copy_from_user(fpsimd.vregs, user->fpsimd->vregs,
+ sizeof(fpsimd.vregs));
+ __get_user_error(fpsimd.fpsr, &user->fpsimd->fpsr, err);
+ __get_user_error(fpsimd.fpcr, &user->fpsimd->fpcr, err);
+
+ /* load the hardware registers from the fpsimd_state structure */
+ if (!err)
+ fpsimd_update_current_state(&fpsimd);
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int restore_sve_fpsimd_context(struct user_ctxs *user)
+{
+ int err;
+ u16 vl, vq;
+
+ err = __get_user(vl, &user->sve->vl);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (!sve_vl_valid(vl))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ vq = sve_vq_from_vl(vl);
+
+ return __restore_sve_fpsimd_context(user, vl, vq);
+}
+
#else /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
-/* Turn any non-optimised out attempt to use this into a link error: */
+/* Turn any non-optimised out attempts to use these into a link error: */
extern int preserve_sve_context(void __user *ctx);
+extern int restore_sve_fpsimd_context(struct user_ctxs *user);
#endif /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
-struct user_ctxs {
- struct fpsimd_context __user *fpsimd;
- struct sve_context __user *sve;
-};
-
static int parse_user_sigframe(struct user_ctxs *user,
struct rt_sigframe __user *sf)
{
@@ -316,6 +370,9 @@ static int parse_user_sigframe(struct user_ctxs *user,
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SVE))
goto invalid;
+ if (!(elf_hwcap & HWCAP_SVE))
+ goto invalid;
+
if (user->sve)
goto invalid;
@@ -375,9 +432,6 @@ static int parse_user_sigframe(struct user_ctxs *user,
}
done:
- if (!user->fpsimd)
- goto invalid;
-
return 0;
invalid:
@@ -411,8 +465,19 @@ static int restore_sigframe(struct pt_regs *regs,
if (err == 0)
err = parse_user_sigframe(&user, sf);
- if (err == 0)
- err = restore_fpsimd_context(user.fpsimd);
+ if (err == 0) {
+ if (!user.fpsimd)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (user.sve) {
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SVE) ||
+ !(elf_hwcap & HWCAP_SVE))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ err = restore_sve_fpsimd_context(&user);
+ } else
+ err = restore_fpsimd_context(user.fpsimd);
+ }
return err;
}
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 14:50 [RFC PATCH v2 00/41] Scalable Vector Extension (SVE) core support Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/41] arm64: signal: Refactor sigcontext parsing in rt_sigreturn Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/41] arm64: signal: factor frame layout and population into separate passes Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/41] arm64: signal: factor out signal frame record allocation Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/41] arm64: signal: Allocate extra sigcontext space as needed Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/41] arm64: signal: Parse extra_context during sigreturn Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/41] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/41] arm64/sve: Allow kernel-mode NEON to be disabled in Kconfig Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/41] arm64/sve: Low-level save/restore code Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/41] arm64/sve: Boot-time feature detection and reporting Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/41] arm64/sve: Boot-time feature enablement Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/41] arm64/sve: Expand task_struct for Scalable Vector Extension state Dave Martin
2017-03-22 16:20 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 10:49 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-23 11:26 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/41] arm64/sve: Save/restore SVE state on context switch paths Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/41] arm64/sve: [BROKEN] Basic support for KERNEL_MODE_NEON Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/41] Revert "arm64/sve: Allow kernel-mode NEON to be disabled in Kconfig" Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/41] arm64/sve: Restore working FPSIMD save/restore around signals Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/41] arm64/sve: signal: Add SVE state record to sigcontext Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/41] arm64/sve: signal: Dump Scalable Vector Extension registers to user stack Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/41] arm64/sve: Avoid corruption when replacing the SVE state Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/41] arm64/sve: traps: Add descriptive string for SVE exceptions Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/41] arm64/sve: Enable SVE on demand for userspace Dave Martin
2017-03-22 16:48 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 11:24 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-23 11:30 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-03-23 11:52 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 12:07 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-23 13:40 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 13:45 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/41] arm64/sve: Implement FPSIMD-only context for tasks not using SVE Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/41] arm64/sve: Move ZEN handling to the common task_fpsimd_load() path Dave Martin
2017-03-22 16:55 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 11:52 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/41] arm64/sve: Discard SVE state on system call Dave Martin
2017-03-22 17:03 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 11:59 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/41] arm64/sve: Avoid preempt_disable() during sigreturn Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/41] arm64/sve: Avoid stale user register state after SVE access exception Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/41] arm64/sve: ptrace support Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/41] arm64: KVM: Treat SVE use by guests as undefined instruction execution Dave Martin
2017-03-22 17:06 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-23 12:10 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/41] prctl: Add skeleton for PR_SVE_{SET, GET}_VL controls Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/41] arm64/sve: Track vector length for each task Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/41] arm64/sve: Set CPU vector length to match current task Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/41] arm64/sve: Factor out clearing of tasks' SVE regs Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/41] arm64/sve: Wire up vector length control prctl() calls Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/41] arm64/sve: Disallow VL setting for individual threads by default Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 35/41] arm64/sve: Add vector length inheritance control Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 36/41] arm64/sve: ptrace: Wire up vector length control and reporting Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 37/41] arm64/sve: Enable default vector length control via procfs Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 38/41] arm64/sve: Detect SVE via the cpufeature framework Dave Martin
2017-03-23 14:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-03-23 14:37 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-23 14:43 ` Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 39/41] arm64/sve: Migrate to cpucap based detection for runtime SVE code Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 40/41] arm64/sve: Allocate task SVE context storage dynamically Dave Martin
2017-03-22 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH v2 41/41] arm64/sve: Documentation: Add overview of the SVE userspace ABI Dave Martin
2017-03-31 15:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/41] Scalable Vector Extension (SVE) core support Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-03 9:45 ` Dave Martin
2017-04-03 10:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-03 10:51 ` Dave Martin
2017-04-03 10:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1490194274-30569-19-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).