From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: msalter@redhat.com (Mark Salter)
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 10:47:28 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: fix NULL dereference in have_cpu_die()
In-Reply-To: <20170324140936.GA29588@leverpostej>
References: <20170324135356.25881-1-msalter@redhat.com>
 <20170324140936.GA29588@leverpostej>
Message-ID: <1490366848.7651.10.camel@redhat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, 2017-03-24 at 14:09 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 09:53:56AM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> > Commit 5c492c3f5255 ("arm64: smp: Add function to determine if cpus are
> > stuck in the kernel") added a helper function to determine if die() is
> > supported in cpu_ops. This function assumes a cpu will have a valid
> > cpu_ops entry, but that may not be the case for cpu0 is spin-table or
> > parking protocol is used to boot secondary cpus. In that case, there
> > is a NULL dereference if have_cpu_die() is called by cpu0. So add a
> > check for a valid cpu_ops before dereferencing it.
> > 
> > Fixes: 5c492c3f5255 ("arm64: smp: Add function to determine if cpus are stuck in the kernel")
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > ?arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> > ?1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> > index ef1caae..9b10365 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ static bool have_cpu_die(void)
> > ?#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > ?	int any_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> > ?
> > -	if (cpu_ops[any_cpu]->cpu_die)
> > +	if (cpu_ops[any_cpu] && cpu_ops[any_cpu]->cpu_die)
> > ?		return true;
> 
> We take similar care in op_cpu_disable() and cpu_die_early(), so this is
> certainly more in keeping with the rest of the arm64 code, and is an
> improvement.
> 
> ... however, I think there is a larger problem. Given cpu_ops can differ
> by CPU, we could encounter a case where some CPUs had PSCI ops, and some
> had none. In that case, have_cpu_die() can return different values on
> different CPUs.
> 
> ... which means that cpus_are_stuck_in_kernel() is on shaky ground, and
> we may need a more comprehensive fix.
> 

Hmm, cpus_are_stuck_in_kernel() is called from hibernate.c where there
would be a problem if any cpu was stuck in kernel. It is also called
from machine_kexec.c where there would be a problem if any but the
calling cpu was stuck in kernel. So clearly something else is needed...