From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dwmw2@infradead.org (David Woodhouse) Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:44:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v34 04/14] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel In-Reply-To: <20170404073504.GI16309@linaro.org> References: <20170328064831.15894-1-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20170328065130.16019-2-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <1491207492.6020.8.camel@infradead.org> <20170404054144.GG16309@linaro.org> <20170404073504.GI16309@linaro.org> Message-ID: <1491291844.6218.25.camel@infradead.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 16:35 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > Because I think that people sometimes use those two interchangeably. > So I said I would defer to the maintainers. Sometimes they do, yes. Just as sometimes people use "their", "they're", and "there" interchangeably. Rarely in a professional context, though. And even more rarely when their error has already been pointed out to them. There are no good reasons to *deliberately* get it wrong. I've heard it suggested that 'MiB' would confuse people who have never seen it before. And that it was ugly. Those arguments were fairly specious when they were first made, and they're even sillier now ? more than 20 years since the binary prefixes were introduced. The alleged confusion, and the perceived ugliness, are purely due to unfamiliarity and will pass. The correctness, and the lack of ambiguity, will not. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 4938 bytes Desc: not available URL: