From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: l.stach@pengutronix.de (Lucas Stach) Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:30:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: imx: gpc: Do not print error message for EPROBE_DEFER In-Reply-To: <1491301683.1654.8.camel@nxp.com> References: <1491299184.2367.12.camel@pengutronix.de> <1491301683.1654.8.camel@nxp.com> Message-ID: <1491301815.2367.21.camel@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Dienstag, den 04.04.2017, 13:28 +0300 schrieb Leonard Crestez: > On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 11:46 +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 31.03.2017, 22:25 +0300 schrieb Leonard Crestez: > > > > > > The pu regulator request will return -EPROBE_DEFER if it has a supply > > > from PMIC and this supply is not yet registered. This does not represent > > > an error since the driver will call probe again later, so only print a > > > warning message in this case. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea > > > Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez > > > --- > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 6 +++++- > > The driver moved places, together with a large rewrite, to > > drivers/soc/imx/. > > > > This issue isn't present in the new driver, so this patch can just be > > dropped. > > Wait, I'm confused. In what tree did that happen? This patch is against > linus's tree as of last week and there is nothing in drivers/soc/imx. > > I saw patches for a new gpcv2 driver but that seems to be only for > imx7. This patch is for imx6. Will that driver also support imx6? Shawns maintainer tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git/log/?h=imx/drivers This is what is staged for the next merge window. Regards, Lucas