linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 12/16] arm64: parking: kill acpi_set_mailbox_entry()
Date: Thu,  6 Apr 2017 19:29:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491503363-17731-13-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491503363-17731-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>

Now that we have acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(), we can use values from the
MADT GICC table directly, and no longer need to stash a copy in our own
datastructure.

This allows us to kill off the acpi_set_mailbox_entry() callback, too.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h             |  5 ----
 arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c | 40 ++++++++++---------------------
 arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c                   | 11 ---------
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
index 0e99978..ebf88e3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -96,13 +96,8 @@ static inline void acpi_init_cpus(void) { }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL
 bool acpi_parking_protocol_valid(int cpu);
-void __init
-acpi_set_mailbox_entry(int cpu, struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *processor);
 #else
 static inline bool acpi_parking_protocol_valid(int cpu) { return false; }
-static inline void
-acpi_set_mailbox_entry(int cpu, struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *processor)
-{}
 #endif
 
 static inline const char *acpi_get_enable_method(int cpu)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
index 1f5655c..e2c7399 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_parking_protocol.c
@@ -28,36 +28,21 @@ struct parking_protocol_mailbox {
 	__le64 entry_point;
 };
 
-struct cpu_mailbox_entry {
-	struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem *mailbox;
-	phys_addr_t mailbox_addr;
-	u8 version;
-	u8 gic_cpu_id;
-};
-
-static struct cpu_mailbox_entry cpu_mailbox_entries[NR_CPUS];
-
-void __init acpi_set_mailbox_entry(int cpu,
-				   struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *p)
-{
-	struct cpu_mailbox_entry *cpu_entry = &cpu_mailbox_entries[cpu];
-
-	cpu_entry->mailbox_addr = p->parked_address;
-	cpu_entry->version = p->parking_version;
-	cpu_entry->gic_cpu_id = p->cpu_interface_number;
-}
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem * , mailboxes);
 
 bool acpi_parking_protocol_valid(int cpu)
 {
-	struct cpu_mailbox_entry *cpu_entry = &cpu_mailbox_entries[cpu];
+	struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *p = acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu);
 
-	return cpu_entry->mailbox_addr && cpu_entry->version;
+	return p->parked_address && p->parking_version;
 }
 
 static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_init(unsigned int cpu)
 {
+	struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *p = acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu);
+
 	pr_debug("%s: ACPI parked addr=%llx\n", __func__,
-		  cpu_mailbox_entries[cpu].mailbox_addr);
+		 p->parked_address);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -69,7 +54,7 @@ static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
 
 static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct cpu_mailbox_entry *cpu_entry = &cpu_mailbox_entries[cpu];
+	struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *p = acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu);
 	struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem *mailbox;
 	__le32 cpu_id;
 
@@ -84,7 +69,7 @@ static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
 	 * by the kernel (it clashes with the linear mapping attributes
 	 * specifications).
 	 */
-	mailbox = ioremap(cpu_entry->mailbox_addr, sizeof(*mailbox));
+	mailbox = ioremap(p->parked_address, sizeof(*mailbox));
 	if (!mailbox)
 		return -EIO;
 
@@ -102,7 +87,7 @@ static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
 	 * stash the mailbox address mapping to use it for further FW
 	 * checks in the postboot method
 	 */
-	cpu_entry->mailbox = mailbox;
+	per_cpu(mailboxes, cpu) = mailbox;
 
 	/*
 	 * We write the entry point and cpu id as LE regardless of the
@@ -111,7 +96,7 @@ static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
 	 * Boot-Loader's endianness before jumping.
 	 */
 	writeq_relaxed(__pa_symbol(secondary_entry), &mailbox->entry_point);
-	writel_relaxed(cpu_entry->gic_cpu_id, &mailbox->cpu_id);
+	writel_relaxed(p->cpu_interface_number, &mailbox->cpu_id);
 
 	arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(cpu));
 
@@ -121,10 +106,11 @@ static int acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu)
 static void acpi_parking_protocol_cpu_postboot(void)
 {
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	struct cpu_mailbox_entry *cpu_entry = &cpu_mailbox_entries[cpu];
-	struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem *mailbox = cpu_entry->mailbox;
+	struct parking_protocol_mailbox __iomem *mailbox;
 	__le64 entry_point;
 
+	mailbox = per_cpu(mailboxes, cpu);
+
 	entry_point = readl_relaxed(&mailbox->entry_point);
 	/*
 	 * Check if firmware has cleared the entry_point as expected
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index 390c277..b37dd83 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -572,17 +572,6 @@ struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(int cpu)
 
 	cpu_madt_gicc[cpu_count] = *processor;
 
-	/*
-	 * Set-up the ACPI parking protocol cpu entries
-	 * while initializing the cpu_logical_map to
-	 * avoid parsing MADT entries multiple times for
-	 * nothing (ie a valid cpu_logical_map entry should
-	 * contain a valid parking protocol data set to
-	 * initialize the cpu if the parking protocol is
-	 * the only available enable method).
-	 */
-	acpi_set_mailbox_entry(cpu_count, processor);
-
 	early_map_cpu_to_node(cpu_count, acpi_numa_get_nid(cpu_count, hwid));
 
 	cpu_count++;
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-06 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-06 18:29 [PATCHv2 00/16] arm_pmu: ACPI support Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 01/16] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: remove pointless PMU disabling Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 02/16] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: define armpmu_init_fn Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 03/16] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: fold init into alloc Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 04/16] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: factor out pmu registration Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 05/16] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: simplify cpu_pmu_request_irqs() Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 06/16] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: handle no platform_device Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 07/16] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rename irq request/free functions Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 08/16] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split cpu-local irq request/free Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 09/16] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: move irq request/free into probe Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 10/16] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split out platform device probe logic Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 11/16] arm64: add function to get a cpu's MADT GICC table Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 13/16] arm64: parking: fix type endianness Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 14/16] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add ACPI framework Mark Rutland
2017-04-07 14:27   ` Will Deacon
2017-04-07 14:49     ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 15/16] arm64: pmuv3: handle !PMUv3 when probing Mark Rutland
2017-04-07 14:29   ` Will Deacon
2017-04-07 16:30     ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-07 18:05     ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-07 19:09       ` Jeremy Linton
2017-04-06 18:29 ` [PATCHv2 16/16] arm64: pmuv3: use arm_pmu ACPI framework Mark Rutland
2017-04-07 14:30 ` [PATCHv2 00/16] arm_pmu: ACPI support Will Deacon
2017-04-07 16:13   ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1491503363-17731-13-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).