linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sricharan@codeaurora.org (Sricharan R)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V11 10/11] iommu/arm-smmu: Clean up early-probing workarounds
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:51:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491823266-1209-11-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491823266-1209-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org>

From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>

Now that the appropriate ordering is enforced via probe-deferral of
masters in core code, rip it all out and bask in the simplicity.

Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
[Sricharan: Rebased on top of ACPI IORT SMMU series]
Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c |  46 +-----------------
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c    | 110 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 5806a6a..9497800 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -2761,51 +2761,9 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	.probe	= arm_smmu_device_probe,
 	.remove	= arm_smmu_device_remove,
 };
+module_platform_driver(arm_smmu_driver);
 
-static int __init arm_smmu_init(void)
-{
-	static bool registered;
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	if (!registered) {
-		ret = platform_driver_register(&arm_smmu_driver);
-		registered = !ret;
-	}
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static void __exit arm_smmu_exit(void)
-{
-	return platform_driver_unregister(&arm_smmu_driver);
-}
-
-subsys_initcall(arm_smmu_init);
-module_exit(arm_smmu_exit);
-
-static int __init arm_smmu_of_init(struct device_node *np)
-{
-	int ret = arm_smmu_init();
-
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	if (!of_platform_device_create(np, NULL, platform_bus_type.dev_root))
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv3, "arm,smmu-v3", arm_smmu_of_init);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-static int __init acpi_smmu_v3_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
-{
-	if (iort_node_match(ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3))
-		return arm_smmu_init();
-
-	return 0;
-}
-IORT_ACPI_DECLARE(arm_smmu_v3, ACPI_SIG_IORT, acpi_smmu_v3_init);
-#endif
+IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv3, "arm,smmu-v3", NULL);
 
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IOMMU API for ARM architected SMMUv3 implementations");
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>");
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index abf6496..be53b02 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -2075,6 +2075,23 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void arm_smmu_bus_init(void)
+{
+	/* Oh, for a proper bus abstraction */
+	if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
+		bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &arm_smmu_ops);
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_AMBA
+	if (!iommu_present(&amba_bustype))
+		bus_set_iommu(&amba_bustype, &arm_smmu_ops);
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
+	if (!iommu_present(&pci_bus_type)) {
+		pci_request_acs();
+		bus_set_iommu(&pci_bus_type, &arm_smmu_ops);
+	}
+#endif
+}
+
 static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct resource *res;
@@ -2180,21 +2197,30 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	arm_smmu_device_reset(smmu);
 	arm_smmu_test_smr_masks(smmu);
 
-	/* Oh, for a proper bus abstraction */
-	if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
-		bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &arm_smmu_ops);
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_AMBA
-	if (!iommu_present(&amba_bustype))
-		bus_set_iommu(&amba_bustype, &arm_smmu_ops);
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
-	if (!iommu_present(&pci_bus_type)) {
-		pci_request_acs();
-		bus_set_iommu(&pci_bus_type, &arm_smmu_ops);
-	}
-#endif
+	/*
+	 * For ACPI and generic DT bindings, an SMMU will be probed before
+	 * any device which might need it, so we want the bus ops in place
+	 * ready to handle default domain setup as soon as any SMMU exists.
+	 */
+	if (!using_legacy_binding)
+		arm_smmu_bus_init();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * With the legacy DT binding in play, though, we have no guarantees about
+ * probe order, but then we're also not doing default domains, so we can
+ * delay setting bus ops until we're sure every possible SMMU is ready,
+ * and that way ensure that no add_device() calls get missed.
+ */
+static int arm_smmu_legacy_bus_init(void)
+{
+	if (using_legacy_binding)
+		arm_smmu_bus_init();
 	return 0;
 }
+device_initcall_sync(arm_smmu_legacy_bus_init);
 
 static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
@@ -2219,56 +2245,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	.probe	= arm_smmu_device_probe,
 	.remove	= arm_smmu_device_remove,
 };
-
-static int __init arm_smmu_init(void)
-{
-	static bool registered;
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	if (!registered) {
-		ret = platform_driver_register(&arm_smmu_driver);
-		registered = !ret;
-	}
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static void __exit arm_smmu_exit(void)
-{
-	return platform_driver_unregister(&arm_smmu_driver);
-}
-
-subsys_initcall(arm_smmu_init);
-module_exit(arm_smmu_exit);
-
-static int __init arm_smmu_of_init(struct device_node *np)
-{
-	int ret = arm_smmu_init();
-
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	if (!of_platform_device_create(np, NULL, platform_bus_type.dev_root))
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv1, "arm,smmu-v1", arm_smmu_of_init);
-IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv2, "arm,smmu-v2", arm_smmu_of_init);
-IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_mmu400, "arm,mmu-400", arm_smmu_of_init);
-IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_mmu401, "arm,mmu-401", arm_smmu_of_init);
-IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_mmu500, "arm,mmu-500", arm_smmu_of_init);
-IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(cavium_smmuv2, "cavium,smmu-v2", arm_smmu_of_init);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-static int __init arm_smmu_acpi_init(struct acpi_table_header *table)
-{
-	if (iort_node_match(ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU))
-		return arm_smmu_init();
-
-	return 0;
-}
-IORT_ACPI_DECLARE(arm_smmu, ACPI_SIG_IORT, arm_smmu_acpi_init);
-#endif
+module_platform_driver(arm_smmu_driver);
+
+IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv1, "arm,smmu-v1", NULL);
+IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_smmuv2, "arm,smmu-v2", NULL);
+IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_mmu400, "arm,mmu-400", NULL);
+IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_mmu401, "arm,mmu-401", NULL);
+IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(arm_mmu500, "arm,mmu-500", NULL);
+IOMMU_OF_DECLARE(cavium_smmuv2, "cavium,smmu-v2", NULL);
 
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IOMMU API for ARM architected SMMU implementations");
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>");
-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-10 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20170410112136epcas2p2cdd7dc21a8dc0ffcfab7f8290c4b7467@epcas2p2.samsung.com>
2017-04-10 11:20 ` [PATCH V11 00/11] IOMMU probe deferral support Sricharan R
2017-04-10 11:20   ` [PATCH V11 01/11] iommu/of: Refactor of_iommu_configure() for error handling Sricharan R
2017-04-10 11:20   ` [PATCH V11 02/11] iommu/of: Prepare for deferred IOMMU configuration Sricharan R
2017-04-10 11:20   ` [PATCH V11 03/11] of: dma: Make of_dma_deconfigure() public Sricharan R
2017-04-10 11:20   ` [PATCH V11 04/11] ACPI/IORT: Add function to check SMMUs drivers presence Sricharan R
2017-04-10 11:21   ` [PATCH V11 05/11] of: device: Fix overflow of coherent_dma_mask Sricharan R
2017-04-10 11:21   ` [PATCH V11 06/11] of/acpi: Configure dma operations at probe time for platform/amba/pci bus devices Sricharan R
2017-04-10 11:21   ` [PATCH V11 07/11] iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error Sricharan R
2017-04-10 11:21   ` [PATCH V11 08/11] drivers: acpi: " Sricharan R
2017-05-23  6:26     ` Nate Watterson
2017-05-23  8:52       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-05-23  9:01         ` Sricharan R
2017-05-23  9:26           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-05-23 11:27             ` Nate Watterson
2017-05-23  8:59       ` Sricharan R
2017-04-10 11:21   ` [PATCH V11 09/11] arm64: dma-mapping: Remove the notifier trick to handle early setting of dma_ops Sricharan R
2017-04-10 11:21   ` Sricharan R [this message]
2017-04-10 11:21   ` [PATCH V11 11/11] ACPI/IORT: Remove linker section for IORT entries probing Sricharan R
2017-04-10 11:56   ` [PATCH V11 00/11] IOMMU probe deferral support Frank Rowand
2017-04-20 14:31   ` Joerg Roedel
2017-05-08 11:23   ` Marek Szyprowski
2017-05-08 14:57     ` Sricharan R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1491823266-1209-11-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).