From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 03/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: fold init into alloc
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:39:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491899997-32210-4-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491899997-32210-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Given we always want to initialise common fields on an allocated PMU,
this patch folds this common initialisation into armpmu_alloc(). This
will make it simpler to reuse this code for an ACPI-specific probe path.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 71a825d..1cb8b1a 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -494,24 +494,6 @@ static ssize_t armpmu_cpumask_show(struct device *dev,
.attrs = armpmu_common_attrs,
};
-static void armpmu_init(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
-{
- armpmu->pmu = (struct pmu) {
- .pmu_enable = armpmu_enable,
- .pmu_disable = armpmu_disable,
- .event_init = armpmu_event_init,
- .add = armpmu_add,
- .del = armpmu_del,
- .start = armpmu_start,
- .stop = armpmu_stop,
- .read = armpmu_read,
- .filter_match = armpmu_filter_match,
- .attr_groups = armpmu->attr_groups,
- };
- armpmu->attr_groups[ARMPMU_ATTR_GROUP_COMMON] =
- &armpmu_common_attr_group;
-}
-
/* Set at runtime when we know what CPU type we are. */
static struct arm_pmu *__oprofile_cpu_pmu;
@@ -766,14 +748,6 @@ static int cpu_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
if (err)
goto out_unregister;
- /*
- * This is a CPU PMU potentially in a heterogeneous configuration (e.g.
- * big.LITTLE). This is not an uncore PMU, and we have taken ctx
- * sharing into account (e.g. with our pmu::filter_match callback and
- * pmu::event_init group validation).
- */
- cpu_pmu->pmu.capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_HETEROGENEOUS_CPUS;
-
return 0;
out_unregister:
@@ -962,6 +936,30 @@ static struct arm_pmu *armpmu_alloc(void)
goto out_free_pmu;
}
+ pmu->pmu = (struct pmu) {
+ .pmu_enable = armpmu_enable,
+ .pmu_disable = armpmu_disable,
+ .event_init = armpmu_event_init,
+ .add = armpmu_add,
+ .del = armpmu_del,
+ .start = armpmu_start,
+ .stop = armpmu_stop,
+ .read = armpmu_read,
+ .filter_match = armpmu_filter_match,
+ .attr_groups = pmu->attr_groups,
+ /*
+ * This is a CPU PMU potentially in a heterogeneous
+ * configuration (e.g. big.LITTLE). This is not an uncore PMU,
+ * and we have taken ctx sharing into account (e.g. with our
+ * pmu::filter_match callback and pmu::event_init group
+ * validation).
+ */
+ .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_HETEROGENEOUS_CPUS,
+ };
+
+ pmu->attr_groups[ARMPMU_ATTR_GROUP_COMMON] =
+ &armpmu_common_attr_group;
+
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct pmu_hw_events *events;
@@ -998,8 +996,6 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
if (!pmu)
return -ENOMEM;
- armpmu_init(pmu);
-
pmu->plat_device = pdev;
ret = pmu_parse_irqs(pmu);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-11 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-11 8:39 [PATCHv3 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 01/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: remove pointless PMU disabling Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 02/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: define armpmu_init_fn Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 04/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: factor out pmu registration Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 05/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: simplify cpu_pmu_request_irqs() Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 06/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: handle no platform_device Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 07/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rename irq request/free functions Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 08/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split cpu-local irq request/free Mark Rutland
2017-04-18 17:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-18 18:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-18 18:33 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-18 18:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-20 19:10 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 09/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: move irq request/free into probe Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 10/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split out platform device probe logic Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 11/14] arm64: add function to get a cpu's MADT GICC table Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 12/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add ACPI framework Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 13/14] arm64: pmuv3: handle !PMUv3 when probing Mark Rutland
2017-04-13 14:06 ` Jayachandran C.
2017-04-13 15:36 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 14/14] arm64: pmuv3: use arm_pmu ACPI framework Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 15:11 ` [PATCHv3 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support Anurup M
2017-04-11 15:45 ` Will Deacon
2017-04-12 6:48 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491899997-32210-4-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).