From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 07/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rename irq request/free functions
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:39:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491899997-32210-8-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491899997-32210-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
For historical reasons, portions of the arm_pmu code use a cpu_pmu_
prefix rather than an armpmu_ prefix. While a minor annoyance, this
hasn't been a problem thusfar.
However, to enable ACPI support, we'll need to expose a few things in
header files, and we should aim to keep those consistently namespaced.
In preparation for exporting our IRQ request/free functions, rename
these to have an armpmu_ prefix. For consistency, the 'cpu_pmu'
parameter is also renamed to 'armpmu'.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 2442038..3c4e97d 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -527,12 +527,12 @@ int perf_num_counters(void)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_num_counters);
-static void cpu_pmu_free_irqs(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+static void armpmu_free_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
{
int cpu;
- struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = cpu_pmu->hw_events;
+ struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = armpmu->hw_events;
- for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->supported_cpus) {
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus) {
int irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
if (!irq)
continue;
@@ -542,20 +542,20 @@ static void cpu_pmu_free_irqs(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
break;
}
- if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs))
+ if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs))
continue;
free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
}
}
-static int cpu_pmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
+static int armpmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
{
int cpu, err;
- struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = cpu_pmu->hw_events;
+ struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = armpmu->hw_events;
const irq_handler_t handler = armpmu_dispatch_irq;
- for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->supported_cpus) {
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus) {
int irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
if (!irq)
continue;
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static int cpu_pmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
return err;
}
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs);
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs);
}
return 0;
@@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ static int cpu_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
{
int err;
- err = cpu_pmu_request_irqs(cpu_pmu);
+ err = armpmu_request_irqs(cpu_pmu);
if (err)
goto out;
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ static int cpu_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_STARTING,
&cpu_pmu->node);
out:
- cpu_pmu_free_irqs(cpu_pmu);
+ armpmu_free_irqs(cpu_pmu);
return err;
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-11 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-11 8:39 [PATCHv3 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 01/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: remove pointless PMU disabling Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 02/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: define armpmu_init_fn Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 03/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: fold init into alloc Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 04/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: factor out pmu registration Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 05/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: simplify cpu_pmu_request_irqs() Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 06/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: handle no platform_device Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 08/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split cpu-local irq request/free Mark Rutland
2017-04-18 17:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-18 18:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-18 18:33 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-18 18:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-20 19:10 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 09/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: move irq request/free into probe Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 10/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split out platform device probe logic Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 11/14] arm64: add function to get a cpu's MADT GICC table Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 12/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add ACPI framework Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 13/14] arm64: pmuv3: handle !PMUv3 when probing Mark Rutland
2017-04-13 14:06 ` Jayachandran C.
2017-04-13 15:36 ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 8:39 ` [PATCHv3 14/14] arm64: pmuv3: use arm_pmu ACPI framework Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 15:11 ` [PATCHv3 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support Anurup M
2017-04-11 15:45 ` Will Deacon
2017-04-12 6:48 ` Hanjun Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1491899997-32210-8-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).