linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 08/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split cpu-local irq request/free
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:39:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491899997-32210-9-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491899997-32210-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>

Currently we have functions to request/free all IRQs for a given PMU.
While this works today, this won't work for ACPI, where we don't know
the full set of IRQs up front, and need to request them separately.

To enable supporting ACPI, this patch splits out the cpu-local
request/free into new functions, allowing us to request/free individual
IRQs.

As this makes it possible/necessary to request a PPI once per cpu, an
additional check is added to detect mismatched PPIs. This shouldn't
matter for the DT / platform case, as we check this when parsing.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
 drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 3c4e97d..c09c379 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -527,65 +527,81 @@ int perf_num_counters(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_num_counters);
 
-static void armpmu_free_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+static void armpmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *armpmu, int cpu)
 {
-	int cpu;
 	struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = armpmu->hw_events;
+	int irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
 
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus) {
-		int irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
-		if (!irq)
-			continue;
+	if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs))
+		return;
 
-		if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
-			free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
-			break;
-		}
+	if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
+		free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
+		cpumask_clear(&armpmu->active_irqs);
+		return;
+	}
 
-		if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs))
-			continue;
+	free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
+}
 
-		free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
-	}
+static void armpmu_free_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+{
+	int cpu;
+
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus)
+		armpmu_free_irq(armpmu, cpu);
 }
 
-static int armpmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+static int armpmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *armpmu, int cpu)
 {
-	int cpu, err;
+	int err = 0;
 	struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = armpmu->hw_events;
 	const irq_handler_t handler = armpmu_dispatch_irq;
+	int irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
+	if (!irq)
+		return 0;
 
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus) {
-		int irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
-		if (!irq)
-			continue;
+	if (irq_is_percpu(irq) && cpumask_empty(&armpmu->active_irqs)) {
+		err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu",
+					 &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
+	} else if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
+		int other_cpu = cpumask_first(&armpmu->active_irqs);
+		int other_irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, other_cpu);
 
-		if (irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
-			err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu",
-						 &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
-			if (err) {
-				pr_err("unable to request IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
-					irq);
-			}
-
-			return err;
+		if (irq != other_irq) {
+			pr_warn("mismatched PPIs detected.\n");
+			err = -EINVAL;
 		}
-
+	} else {
 		err = request_irq(irq, handler,
 				  IRQF_NOBALANCING | IRQF_NO_THREAD, "arm-pmu",
 				  per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
-		if (err) {
-			pr_err("unable to request IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
-				irq);
-			return err;
-		}
+	}
 
-		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_err("unable to request IRQ%d for ARM PMU counters\n",
+			irq);
+		return err;
 	}
 
+	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->active_irqs);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int armpmu_request_irqs(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
+{
+	int cpu, err;
+
+	for_each_cpu(cpu, &armpmu->supported_cpus) {
+		err = armpmu_request_irq(armpmu, cpu);
+		if (err)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int armpmu_get_cpu_irq(struct arm_pmu *pmu, int cpu)
 {
 	struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = pmu->hw_events;
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-11  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-11  8:39 [PATCHv3 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 01/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: remove pointless PMU disabling Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 02/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: define armpmu_init_fn Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 03/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: fold init into alloc Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 04/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: factor out pmu registration Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 05/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: simplify cpu_pmu_request_irqs() Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 06/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: handle no platform_device Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 07/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: rename irq request/free functions Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-04-18 17:25   ` [PATCHv3 08/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split cpu-local irq request/free Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-18 18:24     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-18 18:33     ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-18 18:57       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-20 19:10         ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 09/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: move irq request/free into probe Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 10/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: split out platform device probe logic Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 11/14] arm64: add function to get a cpu's MADT GICC table Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 12/14] drivers/perf: arm_pmu: add ACPI framework Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 13/14] arm64: pmuv3: handle !PMUv3 when probing Mark Rutland
2017-04-13 14:06   ` Jayachandran C.
2017-04-13 15:36     ` Mark Rutland
2017-04-11  8:39 ` [PATCHv3 14/14] arm64: pmuv3: use arm_pmu ACPI framework Mark Rutland
2017-04-11 15:11 ` [PATCHv3 00/14] arm_pmu: ACPI support Anurup M
2017-04-11 15:45 ` Will Deacon
2017-04-12  6:48 ` Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1491899997-32210-9-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).