From: sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com (sunil.kovvuri at gmail.com)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Poll for CMDQ drain completion more effectively
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:43:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493291587-23488-1-git-send-email-sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>
Modified polling on CMDQ consumer similar to how polling is done for TLB SYNC
completion in SMMUv2 driver. Code changes are done with reference to
8513c8930069 iommu/arm-smmu: Poll for TLB sync completion more effectively
Poll timeout has been increased which addresses issue of 100us timeout not
sufficient, when command queue is full with TLB invalidation commands.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Geetha <gakula@cavium.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index d412bdd..34599d4 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -379,6 +379,9 @@
#define CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_NONE (0UL << CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SHIFT)
#define CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SEV (2UL << CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SHIFT)
+#define CMDQ_DRAIN_TIMEOUT_US 1000
+#define CMDQ_SPIN_COUNT 10
+
/* Event queue */
#define EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS 4
#define EVTQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT 7
@@ -737,7 +740,8 @@ static void queue_inc_prod(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
*/
static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool drain, bool wfe)
{
- ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
+ ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), CMDQ_DRAIN_TIMEOUT_US);
+ unsigned int spin_cnt, delay = 1;
while (queue_sync_cons(q), (drain ? !queue_empty(q) : queue_full(q))) {
if (ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0)
@@ -746,8 +750,13 @@ static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool drain, bool wfe)
if (wfe) {
wfe();
} else {
- cpu_relax();
- udelay(1);
+ for (spin_cnt = 0;
+ spin_cnt < CMDQ_SPIN_COUNT; spin_cnt++) {
+ cpu_relax();
+ continue;
+ }
+ udelay(delay);
+ delay *= 2;
}
}
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-04-27 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-27 11:13 sunil.kovvuri at gmail.com [this message]
2017-05-03 13:19 ` [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Poll for CMDQ drain completion more effectively Sunil Kovvuri
2017-05-03 15:37 ` Will Deacon
2017-05-03 15:54 ` Sunil Kovvuri
2017-05-03 15:59 ` Will Deacon
2017-05-03 16:24 ` Sunil Kovvuri
2017-05-03 15:33 ` Robin Murphy
2017-05-03 15:40 ` Will Deacon
2017-05-03 16:23 ` Sunil Kovvuri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1493291587-23488-1-git-send-email-sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com \
--to=sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).