From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 2/2] arm64: cpufeature: use static_branch_enable_cpuslocked()
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:01:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493377266-2205-3-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493377266-2205-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Recently, the hotplug locking was conveted to use a percpu rwsem. Unlike
the existing {get,put}_online_cpus() logic, this can't nest.
Unfortunately, in arm64's secondary boot path we can end up nesting via
static_branch_enable() in cpus_set_cap() when we detect an erratum.
This leads to a stream of messages as below, where the secondary
attempts to schedule before it has been fully onlined. As the CPU
orchestrating the onlining holds the rswem, this hangs the system.
[ 0.250334] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/1/0/0x00000002
[ 0.250337] Modules linked in:
[ 0.250346] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc7-next-20170424 #2
[ 0.250349] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r1) (DT)
[ 0.250353] Call trace:
[ 0.250365] [<ffff000008088510>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x238
[ 0.250371] [<ffff00000808880c>] show_stack+0x14/0x20
[ 0.250377] [<ffff00000839d854>] dump_stack+0x9c/0xc0
[ 0.250384] [<ffff0000080e3540>] __schedule_bug+0x50/0x70
[ 0.250391] [<ffff000008932ecc>] __schedule+0x52c/0x5a8
[ 0.250395] [<ffff000008932f80>] schedule+0x38/0xa0
[ 0.250400] [<ffff000008935e8c>] rwsem_down_read_failed+0xc4/0x108
[ 0.250407] [<ffff0000080fe8e0>] __percpu_down_read+0x100/0x118
[ 0.250414] [<ffff0000080c0b60>] get_online_cpus+0x70/0x78
[ 0.250420] [<ffff0000081749e8>] static_key_enable+0x28/0x48
[ 0.250425] [<ffff00000808de90>] update_cpu_capabilities+0x78/0xf8
[ 0.250430] [<ffff00000808d14c>] update_cpu_errata_workarounds+0x1c/0x28
[ 0.250435] [<ffff00000808e004>] check_local_cpu_capabilities+0xf4/0x128
[ 0.250440] [<ffff00000808e894>] secondary_start_kernel+0x8c/0x118
[ 0.250444] [<000000008093d1b4>] 0x8093d1b4
We call cpus_set_cap() from update_cpu_capabilities(), which is called
from the secondary boot path (where the CPU orchestrating the onlining
holds the hotplug rwsem), and in the primary boot path, where this is
not held.
This patch makes cpus_set_cap() use static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(),
and updates all the callers of update_cpu_capabilities() consistent with
the change.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reported-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
[Mark: minor fixups]
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 3 ++-
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 9 ++++++++-
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 5 ++++-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index f31c48d..a8d1b5b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static inline void cpus_set_cap(unsigned int num)
num, ARM64_NCAPS);
} else {
__set_bit(num, cpu_hwcaps);
- static_branch_enable(&cpu_hwcap_keys[num]);
+ static_branch_enable_cpuslocked(&cpu_hwcap_keys[num]);
}
}
@@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ void update_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps,
void check_local_cpu_capabilities(void);
void update_cpu_errata_workarounds(void);
+void update_cpu_errata_workarounds_cpuslocked(void);
void __init enable_errata_workarounds(void);
void verify_local_cpu_errata_workarounds(void);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index f6cc67e..e650cf8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -175,11 +175,18 @@ void verify_local_cpu_errata_workarounds(void)
}
}
-void update_cpu_errata_workarounds(void)
+void update_cpu_errata_workarounds_cpuslocked(void)
{
update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_errata, "enabling workaround for");
}
+void update_cpu_errata_workarounds(void)
+{
+ get_online_cpus();
+ update_cpu_errata_workarounds_cpuslocked();
+ put_online_cpus();
+}
+
void __init enable_errata_workarounds(void)
{
enable_cpu_capabilities(arm64_errata);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index abda8e8..113c06d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -956,6 +956,7 @@ static void __init setup_elf_hwcaps(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *hwcaps)
cap_set_elf_hwcap(hwcaps);
}
+/* Should be called with CPU hotplug lock held */
void update_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps,
const char *info)
{
@@ -1075,14 +1076,16 @@ void check_local_cpu_capabilities(void)
* advertised capabilities.
*/
if (!sys_caps_initialised)
- update_cpu_errata_workarounds();
+ update_cpu_errata_workarounds_cpuslocked();
else
verify_local_cpu_capabilities();
}
static void __init setup_feature_capabilities(void)
{
+ get_online_cpus();
update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_features, "detected feature:");
+ put_online_cpus();
enable_cpu_capabilities(arm64_features);
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-28 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-28 11:01 [PATCHv3 0/2] arm64: fix hotplug rwsem boot fallout Mark Rutland
2017-04-28 11:01 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] jump_label: Provide static_key_[enable|/slow_inc]_cpuslocked() Mark Rutland
2017-04-28 11:01 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-05-10 18:10 ` [PATCHv3 0/2] arm64: fix hotplug rwsem boot fallout Mark Rutland
2017-05-10 20:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-05-11 8:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-05-11 9:37 ` Mark Rutland
2017-05-11 10:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-05-11 12:54 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1493377266-2205-3-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).