From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] arm64: uaccess: ensure extension of access_ok() addr
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 16:09:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493824178-7399-4-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493824178-7399-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Our access_ok() simply hands its arguments over to __range_ok(), which
implicitly assummes that the addr parameter is 64 bits wide. This isn't
necessarily true for compat code, which might pass down a 32-bit address
parameter.
In these cases, we don't have a guarantee that the address has been zero
extended to 64 bits, and the upper bits of the register may contain
unknown values, potentially resulting in a suprious failure.
Avoid this by explicitly casting the addr parameter to an unsigned long
(as is done on other architectures), ensuring that the parameter is
widened appropriately.
Fixes: 0aea86a2176c2264 ("arm64: User access library functions")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 5308d69..ed3ecf1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -95,11 +95,12 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs)
*/
#define __range_ok(addr, size) \
({ \
+ unsigned long __addr = (unsigned long __force)(addr); \
unsigned long flag, roksum; \
__chk_user_ptr(addr); \
asm("adds %1, %1, %3; ccmp %1, %4, #2, cc; cset %0, ls" \
: "=&r" (flag), "=&r" (roksum) \
- : "1" (addr), "Ir" (size), \
+ : "1" (__addr), "Ir" (size), \
"r" (current_thread_info()->addr_limit) \
: "cc"); \
flag; \
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-03 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-03 15:09 [PATCH 0/6] arm64: inline assembly fixes + cleanup Mark Rutland
2017-05-03 15:09 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm64: xchg: hazard against entire exchange variable Mark Rutland
2017-05-03 15:09 ` [PATCH 2/6] arm64: ensure extension of smp_store_release value Mark Rutland
2017-05-03 15:09 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-05-03 15:09 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm64: armv8_deprecated: ensure extension of addr Mark Rutland
2017-05-05 14:51 ` Punit Agrawal
2017-05-03 15:09 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: atomic_lse: match asm register sizes Mark Rutland
2017-05-03 15:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: uaccess: suppress spurious clang warning Mark Rutland
2017-05-09 15:24 ` [PATCH 0/6] arm64: inline assembly fixes + cleanup Will Deacon
2017-05-10 8:24 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1493824178-7399-4-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).