From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: joe@perches.com (Joe Perches)
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 12:44:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Fix __show_regs output timestamps
In-Reply-To: <20170503192310.GD22219@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <61817479ac8c4c6c8be702d2e2136fddac1b1821.1493228290.git.joe@perches.com>
 <20170503192310.GD22219@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <1493840651.22125.24.camel@perches.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 20:23 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:39:49AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Multiple line formats are not preferred as the second and
> > subsequent lines may not have timestamps.
> > 
> > Lacking timestamps makes reading the output a bit difficult.
> > This also makes arm/arm64 output more similar.
> > 
> > Previous:
> > 
> > [ 1514.093231] pc : [<bf79c304>]    lr : [<bf79ced8>]    psr: a00f0013
> > sp : ecdd7e20  ip : 00000000  fp : ffffffff
> > 
> > New:
> > 
> > [ 1514.093231] pc : [<bf79c304>]    lr : [<bf79ced8>]    psr: a00f0013
> > [ 1514.105316] sp : ecdd7e20  ip : 00000000  fp : ffffffff
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> 
> Hi Joe,
> 
> Could you put this in my patch system please, I'm unlikely to remember to
> apply it otherwise if not already there (massive email backlog.)
> 
> Thanks.

Your patch system bounced my perfectly formatted patch
because your system wants totally unnecessary additional
information specific to your workflow.

No thanks, I don't need the additional work just to
please your system and neither should anyone else.