From: sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com (sunil.kovvuri at gmail.com)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase CMDQ drain timeout value
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 16:47:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493983066-28202-1-git-send-email-sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>
Processing queue full of TLB invalidation commands might
take more time on some platforms than current timeout
of 100us. So increased drain timeout value.
Also now udelay time is increased exponentially for each poll.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>
---
v2
- Addressed Will's and Robin's comments i.e
increased poll timeout only for drain case and removed spin loop
whose logic anyway is screwed up.
- Also changed commit subject and message as this patch no longer
exactly reflects what is done in SMMU driver i.e
8513c8930069 iommu/arm-smmu: Poll for TLB sync completion more effectively
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index d412bdd..cbc8309 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -379,6 +379,8 @@
#define CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_NONE (0UL << CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SHIFT)
#define CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SEV (2UL << CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SHIFT)
+#define CMDQ_DRAIN_TIMEOUT_US 1000
+
/* Event queue */
#define EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS 4
#define EVTQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT 7
@@ -737,7 +739,12 @@ static void queue_inc_prod(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
*/
static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool drain, bool wfe)
{
- ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
+ ktime_t timeout;
+ unsigned int delay = 1;
+
+ /* Wait longer if it's queue drain */
+ timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), drain ? CMDQ_DRAIN_TIMEOUT_US :
+ ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
while (queue_sync_cons(q), (drain ? !queue_empty(q) : queue_full(q))) {
if (ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0)
@@ -747,7 +754,11 @@ static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool drain, bool wfe)
wfe();
} else {
cpu_relax();
- udelay(1);
+ udelay(delay);
+ /* No point in sleeping for fixed time,
+ * if cons isn't moving fast.
+ */
+ delay *= 2;
}
}
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-05-05 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-05 11:17 sunil.kovvuri at gmail.com [this message]
2017-05-29 9:11 ` [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase CMDQ drain timeout value Sunil Kovvuri
2017-05-30 11:18 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1493983066-28202-1-git-send-email-sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com \
--to=sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).