From: jun.gao@mediatek.com (Jun Gao)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm: dts: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c device node
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 21:23:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497360189.930.42.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba658a59-7ef9-2340-57fa-3bcefa3f47ed@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 14:52 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 13/06/17 12:24, Jun Gao wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:36 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/06/17 13:54, Jun Gao wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 15:35 +0800, Jun Gao wrote:
> >>>> From: Jun Gao <jun.gao@mediatek.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Add MT2701 i2c device node.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Gao <jun.gao@mediatek.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
> >> [...]
> >>>
> >>> Dear Matthias,
> >>>
> >>> Could you take this patch together with
> >>> [PATCH v4 1/2]dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c binding ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>
> >> They are both included in the pull request I send [1] [2], or do I miss
> >> something?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/729b7f8dbdaff270c53052897ea06486221a49a2
> >> [2]
> >> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1
> >
> > Dear Matthias,
> >
> > Would you mind to use the same style as follows in i2c-mtk.txt of [2]?
> >
> > "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701
> > "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577
> > "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589
> > "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT7623
> > "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
>
> You mean I should fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding
> description? Or do you mean it should be MTxxxx instead of mtxxxx?
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
Dear Matthias,
I mean fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding description. Is it OK?
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-13 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-26 7:35 [PATCH v4 0/2] Add i2c dt-binding and device node for Mediatek MT2701 Soc Jun Gao
2017-05-26 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c binding Jun Gao
2017-05-29 15:30 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-05-30 21:38 ` Rob Herring
2017-05-31 2:24 ` Jun Gao
2017-05-31 12:05 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-05-26 7:35 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] arm: dts: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c device node Jun Gao
2017-06-12 11:54 ` Jun Gao
2017-06-13 9:36 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-06-13 10:24 ` Jun Gao
2017-06-13 12:52 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-06-13 13:23 ` Jun Gao [this message]
2017-06-13 13:45 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-06-14 1:11 ` Jun Gao
2017-06-14 9:24 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-06-14 9:43 ` Jun Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1497360189.930.42.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=jun.gao@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox