From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jbrunet@baylibre.com (Jerome Brunet)
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:39:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: amlogic: add unstable statement
In-Reply-To: <20170628145343.25443-1-khilman@baylibre.com>
References: <20170628145343.25443-1-khilman@baylibre.com>
Message-ID: <1498664374.2337.7.camel@baylibre.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 07:53 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Due to the lack of documentation on this SoC family, discovery of new
> features, and correcting of previous misunderstandings is expected, so
> it's unrealistic to expect any form of stable bindings for this SoC
> family.??Make that clear inthe binding documentation.
> 

Acked-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>

> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
> ---
> ?Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt | 12 ++++++++++++
> ?1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt
> index bfd5b558477d..9be902b4656d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/amlogic.txt
> @@ -1,6 +1,18 @@
> ?Amlogic MesonX device tree bindings
> ?-------------------------------------------
> ?
> +Work in progress statement:
> +
> +Device tree files and bindings applying to Amlogic SoCs and boards are
> +considered "unstable". Any Amlogic device tree binding may change at
> +any time. Be sure to use a device tree binary and a kernel image
> +generated from the same source tree.
> +
> +Please refer to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ABI.txt for a definition of
> a
> +stable binding/ABI.
> +
> +---------------------------------------------------------------
> +
> ?Boards with the Amlogic Meson6 SoC shall have the following properties:
> ???Required root node property:
> ?????compatible: "amlogic,meson6"