From: jintack.lim@linaro.org (Jintack Lim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 08/38] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 special registers to vcpu context
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:58:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500397144-16232-9-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500397144-16232-1-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org>
To support the virtual EL2 execution, we need to maintain the EL2
special registers such as SPSR_EL2, ELR_EL2 and SP_EL2 in vcpu context.
Note that SP_EL2 is not accessible in EL2, so we don't need a trap
handler for this register.
Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 12 ++++++++++++
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 4 ++++
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h | 8 ++++++++
4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 1dc4ed6..57dccde 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -171,6 +171,15 @@ enum vcpu_sysreg {
NR_SYS_REGS /* Nothing after this line! */
};
+enum el2_special_regs {
+ __INVALID_EL2_SPECIAL_REG__,
+ SPSR_EL2, /* Saved Program Status Register (EL2) */
+ ELR_EL2, /* Exception Link Register (EL2) */
+ SP_EL2, /* Stack Pointer (EL2) */
+
+ NR_EL2_SPECIAL_REGS
+};
+
/* 32bit mapping */
#define c0_MPIDR (MPIDR_EL1 * 2) /* MultiProcessor ID Register */
#define c0_CSSELR (CSSELR_EL1 * 2)/* Cache Size Selection Register */
@@ -218,6 +227,8 @@ struct kvm_cpu_context {
u64 sys_regs[NR_SYS_REGS];
u32 copro[NR_COPRO_REGS];
};
+
+ u64 el2_special_regs[NR_EL2_SPECIAL_REGS];
};
typedef struct kvm_cpu_context kvm_cpu_context_t;
@@ -307,6 +318,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
#define vcpu_gp_regs(v) (&(v)->arch.ctxt.gp_regs)
#define vcpu_sys_reg(v,r) ((v)->arch.ctxt.sys_regs[(r)])
+#define vcpu_el2_sreg(v,r) ((v)->arch.ctxt.el2_special_regs[(r)])
/*
* CP14 and CP15 live in the same array, as they are backed by the
* same system registers.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 9277c4a..98c32ef 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -268,6 +268,8 @@
#define SYS_DACR32_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 3, 0, 0)
+#define SYS_SPSR_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 0)
+#define SYS_ELR_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 1)
#define SYS_SP_EL1 sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 1, 0)
#define SYS_IFSR32_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 0, 1)
@@ -332,6 +334,8 @@
#define SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 0, 3)
#define SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2 sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 1, 0)
+#define SYS_SP_EL2 sys_reg(3, 6, 4, 1, 0)
+
/* Common SCTLR_ELx flags. */
#define SCTLR_ELx_EE (1 << 25)
#define SCTLR_ELx_I (1 << 12)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 1568f8b..2b3ed70 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -900,15 +900,33 @@ static inline void access_rw(struct sys_reg_params *p, u64 *sysreg)
*sysreg = p->regval;
}
+static u64 *get_special_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p)
+{
+ u64 reg = sys_reg(p->Op0, p->Op1, p->CRn, p->CRm, p->Op2);
+
+ switch (reg) {
+ case SYS_SP_EL1:
+ return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.sp_el1;
+ case SYS_ELR_EL2:
+ return &vcpu_el2_sreg(vcpu, ELR_EL2);
+ case SYS_SPSR_EL2:
+ return &vcpu_el2_sreg(vcpu, SPSR_EL2);
+ default:
+ return NULL;
+ };
+}
+
static bool trap_el2_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct sys_reg_params *p,
const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
{
- /* SP_EL1 is NOT maintained in sys_regs array */
- if (sys_reg(p->Op0, p->Op1, p->CRn, p->CRm, p->Op2) == SYS_SP_EL1)
- access_rw(p, &vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.sp_el1);
- else
- access_rw(p, &vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg));
+ u64 *sys_reg;
+
+ sys_reg = get_special_reg(vcpu, p);
+ if (!sys_reg)
+ sys_reg = &vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
+
+ access_rw(p, sys_reg);
return true;
}
@@ -1116,6 +1134,8 @@ static bool trap_el2_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_special, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_ELR_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_special, ELR_EL2, 0 },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), trap_el2_regs },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
@@ -1138,6 +1158,8 @@ static bool trap_el2_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_val, CNTVOFF_EL2, 0 },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_val, CNTHCTL_EL2, 0 },
+
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL2), NULL, reset_special, SP_EL2, 0},
};
static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -2271,6 +2293,8 @@ void kvm_reset_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* Catch someone adding a register without putting in reset entry. */
memset(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.sys_regs, 0x42, sizeof(vcpu->arch.ctxt.sys_regs));
+ memset(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.el2_special_regs, 0x42,
+ sizeof(vcpu->arch.ctxt.el2_special_regs));
/* Generic chip reset first (so target could override). */
reset_sys_reg_descs(vcpu, sys_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs));
@@ -2281,4 +2305,8 @@ void kvm_reset_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
for (num = 1; num < NR_SYS_REGS; num++)
if (vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, num) == 0x4242424242424242)
panic("Didn't reset vcpu_sys_reg(%zi)", num);
+
+ for (num = 1; num < NR_EL2_SPECIAL_REGS; num++)
+ if (vcpu_el2_sreg(vcpu, num) == 0x4242424242424242)
+ panic("Didn't reset vcpu_el2_sreg(%zi)", num);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
index 060f534..827717b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
@@ -99,6 +99,14 @@ static inline void reset_val(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r
vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = r->val;
}
+static inline void reset_special(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+ BUG_ON(!r->reg);
+ BUG_ON(r->reg >= NR_EL2_SPECIAL_REGS);
+ vcpu_el2_sreg(vcpu, r->reg) = r->val;
+}
+
static inline int cmp_sys_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *i1,
const struct sys_reg_desc *i2)
{
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-18 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-18 16:58 [RFC PATCH v2 00/38] Nested Virtualization on KVM/ARM Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/38] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT feature Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/38] KVM: arm/arm64: Enable nested virtualization via command-line Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 19:59 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 13:56 ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/38] KVM: arm64: Add KVM nesting feature Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/38] KVM: arm/arm64: Check if nested virtualization is in use Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 19:59 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 13:59 ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 19:59 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 14:07 ` Jintack Lim
2017-08-01 14:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/38] KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to set PSR_MODE_EL2x Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/38] KVM: arm64: Add vcpu_mode_el2 primitive to support nesting Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/38] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 system registers to vcpu context Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` Jintack Lim [this message]
2017-07-30 19:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/38] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 special " Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 14:08 ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/38] KVM: arm64: Add the shadow context for virtual EL2 execution Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/38] KVM: arm/arm64: Add a framework to prepare " Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 12:02 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/38] KVM: arm64: Set vcpu context depending on the guest exception level Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/38] arm64: Add missing TCR hw defines Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/38] KVM: arm64: Create shadow EL1 registers Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/38] KVM: arm64: Synchronize EL1 system registers on virtual EL2 entry and exit Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/38] KVM: arm64: Move exception macros and enums to a common file Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/38] KVM: arm64: Support to inject exceptions to the virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/38] KVM: arm64: Trap EL1 VM register accesses in " Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/38] KVM: arm64: Trap SPSR_EL1, ELR_EL1 and VBAR_EL1 from " Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/38] KVM: arm64: Trap CPACR_EL1 access in " Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/38] KVM: arm64: Handle eret instruction traps Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 14:11 ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/38] KVM: arm64: Set a handler for the system " Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/38] KVM: arm64: Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/38] KVM: arm64: Inject HVC exceptions to the virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/38] KVM: arm64: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TWX setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/38] KVM: arm64: Respect virtual CPTR_EL2.TFP setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/38] KVM: arm64: Add macros to support the virtual EL2 with VHE Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/38] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 registers defined in ARMv8.1 to vcpu context Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/38] KVM: arm64: Emulate EL12 register accesses from the virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 8:44 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/38] KVM: arm64: Support a VM with VHE considering EL0 of the VHE host Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 9:01 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/38] KVM: arm64: Allow the virtual EL2 to access EL2 states without trap Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 9:37 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/38] KVM: arm64: Manage the shadow states when virtual E2H bit enabled Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 9:57 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/38] KVM: arm64: Trap and emulate CPTR_EL2 accesses via CPACR_EL1 from the virtual EL2 with VHE Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:04 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/38] KVM: arm64: Emulate appropriate VM control system registers Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:09 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/38] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV bit setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 35/38] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV bit setting for EL12 register traps Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:39 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 36/38] KVM: arm64: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TVM and TRVM settings Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:42 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 37/38] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV1 bit setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-19 2:24 ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:53 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 38/38] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual CPTR_EL2.TCPAC setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:59 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 11:03 ` Jintack Lim
2017-08-01 11:20 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-19 2:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/38] Nested Virtualization on KVM/ARM Jintack Lim
2017-07-19 8:49 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-19 14:35 ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-28 20:13 ` Bandan Das
2017-07-28 21:45 ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 13:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 10:48 ` Jintack Lim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1500397144-16232-9-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org \
--to=jintack.lim@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).