linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jintack.lim@linaro.org (Jintack Lim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 08/38] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 special registers to vcpu context
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:58:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1500397144-16232-9-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500397144-16232-1-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org>

To support the virtual EL2 execution, we need to maintain the EL2
special registers such as SPSR_EL2, ELR_EL2 and SP_EL2 in vcpu context.

Note that SP_EL2 is not accessible in EL2, so we don't need a trap
handler for this register.

Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h   |  4 ++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h         |  8 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 1dc4ed6..57dccde 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -171,6 +171,15 @@ enum vcpu_sysreg {
 	NR_SYS_REGS	/* Nothing after this line! */
 };
 
+enum el2_special_regs {
+	__INVALID_EL2_SPECIAL_REG__,
+	SPSR_EL2,	/* Saved Program Status Register (EL2) */
+	ELR_EL2,	/* Exception Link Register (EL2) */
+	SP_EL2,		/* Stack Pointer (EL2) */
+
+	NR_EL2_SPECIAL_REGS
+};
+
 /* 32bit mapping */
 #define c0_MPIDR	(MPIDR_EL1 * 2)	/* MultiProcessor ID Register */
 #define c0_CSSELR	(CSSELR_EL1 * 2)/* Cache Size Selection Register */
@@ -218,6 +227,8 @@ struct kvm_cpu_context {
 		u64 sys_regs[NR_SYS_REGS];
 		u32 copro[NR_COPRO_REGS];
 	};
+
+	u64 el2_special_regs[NR_EL2_SPECIAL_REGS];
 };
 
 typedef struct kvm_cpu_context kvm_cpu_context_t;
@@ -307,6 +318,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 
 #define vcpu_gp_regs(v)		(&(v)->arch.ctxt.gp_regs)
 #define vcpu_sys_reg(v,r)	((v)->arch.ctxt.sys_regs[(r)])
+#define vcpu_el2_sreg(v,r)	((v)->arch.ctxt.el2_special_regs[(r)])
 /*
  * CP14 and CP15 live in the same array, as they are backed by the
  * same system registers.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
index 9277c4a..98c32ef 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -268,6 +268,8 @@
 
 #define SYS_DACR32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 3, 0, 0)
 
+#define SYS_SPSR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 0)
+#define SYS_ELR_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 0, 1)
 #define SYS_SP_EL1			sys_reg(3, 4, 4, 1, 0)
 
 #define SYS_IFSR32_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 5, 0, 1)
@@ -332,6 +334,8 @@
 #define SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 0, 3)
 #define SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2			sys_reg(3, 4, 14, 1, 0)
 
+#define SYS_SP_EL2			sys_reg(3, 6, 4, 1, 0)
+
 /* Common SCTLR_ELx flags. */
 #define SCTLR_ELx_EE    (1 << 25)
 #define SCTLR_ELx_I	(1 << 12)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 1568f8b..2b3ed70 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -900,15 +900,33 @@ static inline void access_rw(struct sys_reg_params *p, u64 *sysreg)
 		*sysreg = p->regval;
 }
 
+static u64 *get_special_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p)
+{
+	u64 reg = sys_reg(p->Op0, p->Op1, p->CRn, p->CRm, p->Op2);
+
+	switch (reg) {
+	case SYS_SP_EL1:
+		return &vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.sp_el1;
+	case SYS_ELR_EL2:
+		return &vcpu_el2_sreg(vcpu, ELR_EL2);
+	case SYS_SPSR_EL2:
+		return &vcpu_el2_sreg(vcpu, SPSR_EL2);
+	default:
+		return NULL;
+	};
+}
+
 static bool trap_el2_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			 struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
-	/* SP_EL1 is NOT maintained in sys_regs array */
-	if (sys_reg(p->Op0, p->Op1, p->CRn, p->CRm, p->Op2) == SYS_SP_EL1)
-		access_rw(p, &vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.sp_el1);
-	else
-		access_rw(p, &vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg));
+	u64 *sys_reg;
+
+	sys_reg = get_special_reg(vcpu, p);
+	if (!sys_reg)
+		sys_reg = &vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
+
+	access_rw(p, sys_reg);
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -1116,6 +1134,8 @@ static bool trap_el2_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
 
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SPSR_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_special, SPSR_EL2, 0 },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_ELR_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_special, ELR_EL2, 0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), trap_el2_regs },
 
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
@@ -1138,6 +1158,8 @@ static bool trap_el2_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTVOFF_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_val, CNTVOFF_EL2, 0 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_CNTHCTL_EL2), trap_el2_regs, reset_val, CNTHCTL_EL2, 0 },
+
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL2), NULL, reset_special, SP_EL2, 0},
 };
 
 static bool trap_dbgidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -2271,6 +2293,8 @@ void kvm_reset_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	/* Catch someone adding a register without putting in reset entry. */
 	memset(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.sys_regs, 0x42, sizeof(vcpu->arch.ctxt.sys_regs));
+	memset(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.el2_special_regs, 0x42,
+	       sizeof(vcpu->arch.ctxt.el2_special_regs));
 
 	/* Generic chip reset first (so target could override). */
 	reset_sys_reg_descs(vcpu, sys_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs));
@@ -2281,4 +2305,8 @@ void kvm_reset_sys_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	for (num = 1; num < NR_SYS_REGS; num++)
 		if (vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, num) == 0x4242424242424242)
 			panic("Didn't reset vcpu_sys_reg(%zi)", num);
+
+	for (num = 1; num < NR_EL2_SPECIAL_REGS; num++)
+		if (vcpu_el2_sreg(vcpu, num) == 0x4242424242424242)
+			panic("Didn't reset vcpu_el2_sreg(%zi)", num);
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
index 060f534..827717b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
@@ -99,6 +99,14 @@ static inline void reset_val(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r
 	vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) = r->val;
 }
 
+static inline void reset_special(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	BUG_ON(!r->reg);
+	BUG_ON(r->reg >= NR_EL2_SPECIAL_REGS);
+	vcpu_el2_sreg(vcpu, r->reg) = r->val;
+}
+
 static inline int cmp_sys_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *i1,
 			      const struct sys_reg_desc *i2)
 {
-- 
1.9.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-18 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-18 16:58 [RFC PATCH v2 00/38] Nested Virtualization on KVM/ARM Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/38] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_NESTED_VIRT feature Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/38] KVM: arm/arm64: Enable nested virtualization via command-line Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 19:59   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 13:56     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/38] KVM: arm64: Add KVM nesting feature Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/38] KVM: arm/arm64: Check if nested virtualization is in use Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 19:59   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 13:59     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 19:59   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 14:07     ` Jintack Lim
2017-08-01 14:58       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/38] KVM: arm64: Allow userspace to set PSR_MODE_EL2x Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/38] KVM: arm64: Add vcpu_mode_el2 primitive to support nesting Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/38] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 system registers to vcpu context Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` Jintack Lim [this message]
2017-07-30 19:59   ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/38] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 special " Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 14:08     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/38] KVM: arm64: Add the shadow context for virtual EL2 execution Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/38] KVM: arm/arm64: Add a framework to prepare " Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 12:02   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/38] KVM: arm64: Set vcpu context depending on the guest exception level Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/38] arm64: Add missing TCR hw defines Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/38] KVM: arm64: Create shadow EL1 registers Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/38] KVM: arm64: Synchronize EL1 system registers on virtual EL2 entry and exit Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/38] KVM: arm64: Move exception macros and enums to a common file Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/38] KVM: arm64: Support to inject exceptions to the virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/38] KVM: arm64: Trap EL1 VM register accesses in " Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/38] KVM: arm64: Trap SPSR_EL1, ELR_EL1 and VBAR_EL1 from " Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/38] KVM: arm64: Trap CPACR_EL1 access in " Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/38] KVM: arm64: Handle eret instruction traps Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 14:11     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/38] KVM: arm64: Set a handler for the system " Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/38] KVM: arm64: Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/38] KVM: arm64: Inject HVC exceptions to the virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/38] KVM: arm64: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TWX setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/38] KVM: arm64: Respect virtual CPTR_EL2.TFP setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-30 20:00   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/38] KVM: arm64: Add macros to support the virtual EL2 with VHE Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/38] KVM: arm64: Add EL2 registers defined in ARMv8.1 to vcpu context Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/38] KVM: arm64: Emulate EL12 register accesses from the virtual EL2 Jintack Lim
2017-07-31  8:44   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 29/38] KVM: arm64: Support a VM with VHE considering EL0 of the VHE host Jintack Lim
2017-07-31  9:01   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 30/38] KVM: arm64: Allow the virtual EL2 to access EL2 states without trap Jintack Lim
2017-07-31  9:37   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 31/38] KVM: arm64: Manage the shadow states when virtual E2H bit enabled Jintack Lim
2017-07-31  9:57   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 32/38] KVM: arm64: Trap and emulate CPTR_EL2 accesses via CPACR_EL1 from the virtual EL2 with VHE Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:04   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 33/38] KVM: arm64: Emulate appropriate VM control system registers Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:09   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 34/38] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV bit setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 35/38] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV bit setting for EL12 register traps Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:39   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 36/38] KVM: arm64: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TVM and TRVM settings Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:42   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 37/38] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual HCR_EL2.NV1 bit setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-19  2:24   ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:53   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-18 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 38/38] KVM: arm64: Respect the virtual CPTR_EL2.TCPAC setting Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 12:59   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 11:03     ` Jintack Lim
2017-08-01 11:20       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-19  2:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/38] Nested Virtualization on KVM/ARM Jintack Lim
2017-07-19  8:49   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-07-19 14:35     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-28 20:13   ` Bandan Das
2017-07-28 21:45     ` Jintack Lim
2017-07-31 13:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-08-01 10:48   ` Jintack Lim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1500397144-16232-9-git-send-email-jintack.lim@linaro.org \
    --to=jintack.lim@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).