From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 7/7] arm64: unwind: remove sp from struct stackframe
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:18:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1501093110-3844-8-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1501093110-3844-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
The unwind code sets the sp member of struct stackframe to
'frame pointer + 0x10' unconditionally, without regard for whether
doing so produces a legal value. So let's simply remove it now that
we have stopped using it anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 1 -
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 1 -
arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 5 +----
arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c | 1 -
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 4 ----
arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 1 -
arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 --
7 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 5b6eafc..3bebab3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
struct stackframe {
unsigned long fp;
- unsigned long sp;
unsigned long pc;
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
unsigned int graph;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
index 713ca82..bcafd7d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
@@ -162,7 +162,6 @@ void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
}
frame.fp = regs->regs[29];
- frame.sp = regs->sp;
frame.pc = regs->pc;
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
frame.graph = current->curr_ret_stack;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 659ae80..85b953d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -382,15 +382,12 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
return 0;
frame.fp = thread_saved_fp(p);
- frame.sp = thread_saved_sp(p);
frame.pc = thread_saved_pc(p);
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
frame.graph = p->curr_ret_stack;
#endif
do {
- if (frame.sp < stack_page ||
- frame.sp >= stack_page + THREAD_SIZE ||
- unwind_frame(p, &frame))
+ if (unwind_frame(p, &frame))
goto out;
if (!in_sched_functions(frame.pc)) {
ret = frame.pc;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
index 12a87f2..933adbc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ void *return_address(unsigned int level)
data.addr = NULL;
frame.fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0);
- frame.sp = current_stack_pointer;
frame.pc = (unsigned long)return_address; /* dummy */
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
frame.graph = current->curr_ret_stack;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index b079af1..54f3463 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
!on_task_stack(tsk, fp))
return -EINVAL;
- frame->sp = fp + 0x10;
frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
@@ -127,7 +126,6 @@ void save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace)
data.no_sched_functions = 0;
frame.fp = regs->regs[29];
- frame.sp = regs->sp;
frame.pc = regs->pc;
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
frame.graph = current->curr_ret_stack;
@@ -152,12 +150,10 @@ void save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
if (tsk != current) {
data.no_sched_functions = 1;
frame.fp = thread_saved_fp(tsk);
- frame.sp = thread_saved_sp(tsk);
frame.pc = thread_saved_pc(tsk);
} else {
data.no_sched_functions = 0;
frame.fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0);
- frame.sp = current_stack_pointer;
frame.pc = (unsigned long)save_stack_trace_tsk;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
index da33c90..a439128 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs)
return regs->pc;
frame.fp = regs->regs[29];
- frame.sp = regs->sp;
frame.pc = regs->pc;
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
frame.graph = -1; /* no task info */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index caf2f79..63cbfb0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -155,14 +155,12 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
if (tsk == current) {
frame.fp = (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0);
- frame.sp = current_stack_pointer;
frame.pc = (unsigned long)dump_backtrace;
} else {
/*
* task blocked in __switch_to
*/
frame.fp = thread_saved_fp(tsk);
- frame.sp = thread_saved_sp(tsk);
frame.pc = thread_saved_pc(tsk);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
--
1.9.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-26 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 18:18 [PATCHv2 0/7] arm64: unwind: fix broken exception stack dump Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 1/7] arm64: Add ASM_BUG() Mark Rutland
2017-08-08 15:31 ` Mark Rutland
2017-08-08 15:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-08 16:10 ` Mark Rutland
2017-08-09 10:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-09 13:21 ` Mark Rutland
2017-08-09 14:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 2/7] arm64: consistently use bl for C exception entry Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 3/7] arm64: move non-entry code out of .entry.text Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 21:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-31 10:21 ` Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 4/7] arm64: unwind: avoid percpu indirection for irq stack Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 5/7] arm64: unwind: disregard frame.sp when validating frame pointer Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 6/7] arm64: unwind: reference pt_regs via embedded stack frame Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 18:18 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1501093110-3844-8-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).