From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/14] arm64: add on_accessible_stack()
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 19:36:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502130965-18710-14-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502130965-18710-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Both unwind_frame() and dump_backtrace() try to check whether a stack
address is sane to access, with very similar logic. Both will need
updating in order to handle overflow stacks.
Factor out this logic into a helper, so that we can avoid further
duplication when we add overflow stacks.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 7 +------
arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 3 +--
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 4c68d8a..92ddb6d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -57,4 +57,20 @@ static inline bool on_task_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long sp)
return (low <= sp && sp < high);
}
+/*
+ * We can only safely access per-cpu stacks from current in a non-preemptible
+ * context.
+ */
+static inline bool on_accessible_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long sp)
+{
+ if (on_task_stack(tsk, sp))
+ return true;
+ if (tsk != current || preemptible())
+ return false;
+ if (on_irq_stack(sp))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
#endif /* __ASM_STACKTRACE_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 54f3463..d9b80eb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -50,12 +50,7 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
if (!tsk)
tsk = current;
- /*
- * Switching between stacks is valid when tracing current and in
- * non-preemptible context.
- */
- if (!(tsk == current && !preemptible() && on_irq_stack(fp)) &&
- !on_task_stack(tsk, fp))
+ if (!on_accessible_stack(tsk, fp))
return -EINVAL;
frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index 9633773..d01c598 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -193,8 +193,7 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
if (in_entry_text(frame.pc)) {
stack = frame.fp - offsetof(struct pt_regs, stackframe);
- if (on_task_stack(tsk, stack) ||
- (tsk == current && !preemptible() && on_irq_stack(stack)))
+ if (on_accessible_stack(tsk, stack))
dump_mem("", "Exception stack", stack,
stack + sizeof(struct pt_regs));
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-07 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-07 18:35 [PATCH 00/14] arm64: VMAP_STACK support Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:35 ` [PATCH 01/14] arm64: remove __die()'s stack dump Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:35 ` [PATCH 02/14] fork: allow arch-override of VMAP stack alignment Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:35 ` [PATCH 03/14] arm64: kernel: remove {THREAD,IRQ_STACK}_START_SP Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:35 ` [PATCH 04/14] arm64: factor out PAGE_* and CONT_* definitions Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:35 ` [PATCH 05/14] arm64: clean up THREAD_* definitions Mark Rutland
2017-08-14 11:59 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-14 13:10 ` Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:35 ` [PATCH 06/14] arm64: clean up irq stack definitions Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:35 ` [PATCH 07/14] arm64: move SEGMENT_ALIGN to <asm/memory.h> Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:35 ` [PATCH 08/14] efi/arm64: add EFI_KIMG_ALIGN Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:36 ` [PATCH 09/14] arm64: factor out entry stack manipulation Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:36 ` [PATCH 10/14] arm64: assembler: allow adr_this_cpu to use the stack pointer Mark Rutland
2017-08-14 17:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-14 17:42 ` Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:36 ` [PATCH 11/14] arm64: use an irq " Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:36 ` [PATCH 12/14] arm64: add basic VMAP_STACK support Mark Rutland
2017-08-07 18:36 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-08-07 18:36 ` [PATCH 14/14] arm64: add VMAP_STACK overflow detection Mark Rutland
2017-08-14 15:32 ` Will Deacon
2017-08-14 17:25 ` Mark Rutland
2017-08-15 11:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-15 11:19 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1502130965-18710-14-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).