From: david.wu@rock-chips.com (David Wu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/7] pwm: rockchip: Add rk3328 pwm support
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 23:42:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502206967-24366-1-git-send-email-david.wu@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502206715-24174-1-git-send-email-david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The rk3328 soc supports atomic update, we could lock the configuration
of period and duty at first, after unlock is configured, the period and
duty are effective at the same time.
If the polarity, period and duty need to be configured together,
the way for atomic update is "configure lock and old polarity" ->
"configure period and duty" -> "configure unlock and new polarity".
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
index a3fcb40..4d99d46 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#define PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE (1 << 4)
#define PWM_POLARITY_MASK (PWM_DUTY_POSITIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_POSITIVE)
#define PWM_OUTPUT_LEFT (0 << 5)
+#define PWM_LOCK_EN (1 << 6)
#define PWM_LP_DISABLE (0 << 8)
struct rockchip_pwm_chip {
@@ -50,6 +51,7 @@ struct rockchip_pwm_data {
struct rockchip_pwm_regs regs;
unsigned int prescaler;
bool supports_polarity;
+ bool supports_lock;
u32 enable_conf;
};
@@ -121,10 +123,19 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
div = clk_rate * state->duty_cycle;
duty = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(div, pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC);
+ /*
+ * Lock the period and duty of previous configuration, then
+ * change the duty and period, that would not be effective.
+ */
+ ctrl = readl_relaxed(pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl);
+ if (pc->data->supports_lock) {
+ ctrl |= PWM_LOCK_EN;
+ writel_relaxed(ctrl, pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl);
+ }
+
writel(period, pc->base + pc->data->regs.period);
writel(duty, pc->base + pc->data->regs.duty);
- ctrl = readl_relaxed(pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl);
if (pc->data->supports_polarity) {
ctrl &= ~PWM_POLARITY_MASK;
if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
@@ -132,6 +143,15 @@ static void rockchip_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
else
ctrl |= PWM_DUTY_POSITIVE | PWM_INACTIVE_NEGATIVE;
}
+
+ /*
+ * Unlock and set polarity at the same time,
+ * the configuration of duty, period and polarity
+ * would be effective together at next period.
+ */
+ if (pc->data->supports_lock)
+ ctrl &= ~PWM_LOCK_EN;
+
writel(ctrl, pc->base + pc->data->regs.ctrl);
}
@@ -180,7 +200,8 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
pwm_get_state(pwm, &curstate);
enabled = curstate.enabled;
- if (state->polarity != curstate.polarity && enabled) {
+ if (state->polarity != curstate.polarity && enabled &&
+ !pc->data->supports_lock) {
ret = rockchip_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, false);
if (ret)
goto out;
@@ -221,6 +242,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
},
.prescaler = 2,
.supports_polarity = false,
+ .supports_lock = false,
.enable_conf = PWM_CTRL_OUTPUT_EN | PWM_CTRL_TIMER_EN,
};
@@ -233,6 +255,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
},
.prescaler = 1,
.supports_polarity = true,
+ .supports_lock = false,
.enable_conf = PWM_OUTPUT_LEFT | PWM_LP_DISABLE | PWM_ENABLE |
PWM_CONTINUOUS,
};
@@ -246,6 +269,21 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
},
.prescaler = 1,
.supports_polarity = true,
+ .supports_lock = false,
+ .enable_conf = PWM_OUTPUT_LEFT | PWM_LP_DISABLE | PWM_ENABLE |
+ PWM_CONTINUOUS,
+};
+
+static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v3 = {
+ .regs = {
+ .duty = 0x08,
+ .period = 0x04,
+ .cntr = 0x00,
+ .ctrl = 0x0c,
+ },
+ .prescaler = 1,
+ .supports_polarity = true,
+ .supports_lock = true,
.enable_conf = PWM_OUTPUT_LEFT | PWM_LP_DISABLE | PWM_ENABLE |
PWM_CONTINUOUS,
};
@@ -254,6 +292,7 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk2928-pwm", .data = &pwm_data_v1},
{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-pwm", .data = &pwm_data_v2},
{ .compatible = "rockchip,vop-pwm", .data = &pwm_data_vop},
+ { .compatible = "rockchip,rk3328-pwm", .data = &pwm_data_v3},
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_pwm_dt_ids);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-08 15:38 [PATCH v3 0/7] Add rk3328 pwm support David Wu
2017-08-08 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] pwm: rockchip: Add APB and function both clocks support David Wu
2017-08-18 15:31 ` Thierry Reding
2017-08-08 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] pwm: rockchip: Remove the judge from return value of pwm_config David Wu
2017-08-18 15:32 ` Thierry Reding
2017-08-18 16:28 ` Brian Norris
2017-08-21 11:29 ` David.Wu
2017-08-08 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] pwm: rockchip: Use pwm_apply instead of the pwm_enable David Wu
2017-08-18 15:36 ` Thierry Reding
2017-08-08 15:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] pwm: rockchip: Move the configuration of polarity from rockchip_pwm_set_enable() to rockchip_pwm_config() David Wu
2017-08-18 15:40 ` Thierry Reding
2017-08-08 15:41 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] pwm: rockchip: Use same pwm ops for each IP David Wu
2017-08-18 15:43 ` Thierry Reding
2017-08-18 15:44 ` Thierry Reding
2017-08-08 15:42 ` David Wu [this message]
2017-08-18 15:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] pwm: rockchip: Add rk3328 pwm support Thierry Reding
2017-08-08 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add pwm nodes for rk3328 David Wu
2017-08-18 23:06 ` Heiko Stuebner
2017-08-14 2:46 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Add rk3328 pwm support David.Wu
2017-08-16 10:49 ` David.Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1502206967-24366-1-git-send-email-david.wu@rock-chips.com \
--to=david.wu@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).