From: vviswana@codeaurora.org (Vijay Viswanath)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add support to wait for power irq
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 10:49:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503033582-48703-4-git-send-email-vviswana@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503033582-48703-1-git-send-email-vviswana@codeaurora.org>
From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Add support API which will check if power irq is expected to be
generated and wait for the power irq to come and complete if the irq is
expected.
Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Vijay Viswanath <vviswana@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 123 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
index f3e0489..6d3b1fd 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c
@@ -123,6 +123,10 @@
#define CMUX_SHIFT_PHASE_MASK (7 << CMUX_SHIFT_PHASE_SHIFT)
#define MSM_MMC_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY_MS 50
+
+/* Timeout value to avoid infinite waiting for pwr_irq */
+#define MSM_PWR_IRQ_TIMEOUT_MS 5000
+
struct sdhci_msm_host {
struct platform_device *pdev;
void __iomem *core_mem; /* MSM SDCC mapped address */
@@ -138,6 +142,11 @@ struct sdhci_msm_host {
bool calibration_done;
u8 saved_tuning_phase;
bool use_cdclp533;
+ u32 curr_pwr_state;
+ u32 curr_io_level;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_IO_ACCESSORS
+ struct completion pwr_irq_completion;
+#endif
};
static unsigned int msm_get_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host,
@@ -995,6 +1004,90 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host,
sdhci_msm_hs400(host, &mmc->ios);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_IO_ACCESSORS
+static inline void sdhci_msm_init_pwr_irq_completion(
+ struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
+{
+ init_completion(&msm_host->pwr_irq_completion);
+}
+
+static inline void sdhci_msm_complete_pwr_irq_completion(
+ struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
+{
+ complete(&msm_host->pwr_irq_completion);
+}
+
+/*
+ * sdhci_msm_check_power_status API should be called when registers writes
+ * which can toggle sdhci IO bus ON/OFF or change IO lines HIGH/LOW happens.
+ * To what state the register writes will change the IO lines should be passed
+ * as the argument req_type. This API will check whether the IO line's state
+ * is already the expected state and will wait for power irq only if
+ * power irq is expected to be trigerred based on the current IO line state
+ * and expected IO line state.
+ */
+static void sdhci_msm_check_power_status(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 req_type)
+{
+ struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
+ struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool done = false;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
+ pr_debug("%s: %s: request %d curr_pwr_state %x curr_io_level %x\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host->mmc), __func__, req_type,
+ msm_host->curr_pwr_state, msm_host->curr_io_level);
+
+ /*
+ * The IRQ for request type IO High/LOW will be generated when -
+ * there is a state change in 1.8V enable bit (bit 3) of
+ * SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2 register. The reset state of that bit is 0
+ * which indicates 3.3V IO voltage. So, when MMC core layer tries
+ * to set it to 3.3V before card detection happens, the
+ * IRQ doesn't get triggered as there is no state change in this bit.
+ * The driver already handles this case by changing the IO voltage
+ * level to high as part of controller power up sequence. Hence, check
+ * for host->pwr to handle a case where IO voltage high request is
+ * issued even before controller power up.
+ */
+ if ((req_type & REQ_IO_HIGH) && !host->pwr) {
+ pr_debug("%s: do not wait for power IRQ that never comes\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
+ return;
+ }
+ if ((req_type & msm_host->curr_pwr_state) ||
+ (req_type & msm_host->curr_io_level))
+ done = true;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
+ /*
+ * This is needed here to hanlde a case where IRQ gets
+ * triggered even before this function is called so that
+ * x->done counter of completion gets reset. Otherwise,
+ * next call to wait_for_completion returns immediately
+ * without actually waiting for the IRQ to be handled.
+ */
+ if (done)
+ init_completion(&msm_host->pwr_irq_completion);
+ else if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&msm_host->pwr_irq_completion,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(MSM_PWR_IRQ_TIMEOUT_MS)))
+ __WARN_printf("%s: request(%d) timed out waiting for pwr_irq\n",
+ mmc_hostname(host->mmc), req_type);
+ pr_debug("%s: %s: request %d done\n", mmc_hostname(host->mmc),
+ __func__, req_type);
+}
+#else
+static inline void sdhci_msm_init_pwr_irq_completion(
+ struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void sdhci_msm_complete_pwr_irq_completion(
+ struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
static void sdhci_msm_dump_pwr_ctrl_regs(struct sdhci_host *host)
{
struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
@@ -1013,6 +1106,9 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq)
struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
u32 irq_status, irq_ack = 0;
int retry = 10;
+ int pwr_state = 0, io_level = 0;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
irq_status = readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_STATUS);
irq_status &= INT_MASK;
@@ -1040,10 +1136,26 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq)
udelay(10);
}
- if (irq_status & (CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_ON | CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_OFF))
+ /* Handle BUS ON/OFF*/
+ if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_ON) {
+ pwr_state = REQ_BUS_ON;
+ io_level = REQ_IO_HIGH;
+ irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS;
+ }
+ if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_OFF) {
+ pwr_state = REQ_BUS_OFF;
+ io_level = REQ_IO_LOW;
irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS;
- if (irq_status & (CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW | CORE_PWRCTL_IO_HIGH))
+ }
+ /* Handle IO LOW/HIGH */
+ if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW) {
+ io_level = REQ_IO_LOW;
irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS;
+ }
+ if (irq_status & CORE_PWRCTL_IO_HIGH) {
+ io_level = REQ_IO_HIGH;
+ irq_ack |= CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS;
+ }
/*
* The driver has to acknowledge the interrupt, switch voltages and
@@ -1052,6 +1164,14 @@ static void sdhci_msm_handle_pwr_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, int irq)
*/
writel_relaxed(irq_ack, msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CTL);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
+ if (pwr_state)
+ msm_host->curr_pwr_state = pwr_state;
+ if (io_level)
+ msm_host->curr_io_level = io_level;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
+ sdhci_msm_complete_pwr_irq_completion(msm_host);
+
pr_debug("%s: %s: Handled IRQ(%d), irq_status=0x%x, ack=0x%x\n",
mmc_hostname(msm_host->mmc), __func__, irq, irq_status,
irq_ack);
@@ -1319,6 +1439,7 @@ static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto clk_disable;
}
+ sdhci_msm_init_pwr_irq_completion(msm_host);
/* Enable pwr irq interrupts */
writel_relaxed(INT_MASK, msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_MASK);
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-18 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-18 5:19 [PATCH 0/5] mmc: sdhci-msm: Corrections to implementation of power irq Vijay Viswanath
2017-08-18 5:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] mmc: sdhci-msm: fix issue with " Vijay Viswanath
2017-08-24 7:40 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-08-28 12:33 ` Vijay Viswanath
2017-08-18 5:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] mmc: sdhci-msm: Fix HW issue with power IRQ handling during reset Vijay Viswanath
2017-08-24 7:42 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-08-28 12:34 ` Vijay Viswanath
2017-08-18 5:19 ` Vijay Viswanath [this message]
2017-08-24 10:05 ` [PATCH 3/5] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add support to wait for power irq Adrian Hunter
2017-08-28 12:34 ` Vijay Viswanath
2017-08-18 5:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add ops to do sdhc register write Vijay Viswanath
2017-08-24 10:11 ` Adrian Hunter
2017-08-28 12:35 ` Vijay Viswanath
2017-08-18 5:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] defconfig: msm: Enable CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_IO_ACCESSORS Vijay Viswanath
2017-08-22 9:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-08-28 12:35 ` Vijay Viswanath
2017-08-22 9:40 ` [PATCH 0/5] mmc: sdhci-msm: Corrections to implementation of power irq Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1503033582-48703-4-git-send-email-vviswana@codeaurora.org \
--to=vviswana@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).