From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Use larger stacks when KASAN is selected
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:25:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507051546-11677-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
AddressSanitizer instrumentation can significantly bloat the stack, and
with GCC 7 this can result in stack overflows at boot time in some
configurations.
We can avoid this by doubling our stack size when KASAN is in use, as is
already done on x86 (and has been since KASAN was introduced).
Regardless of other patches to decrease KASAN's stack utilization,
kernels built with KASAN will always require more stack space than those
built without, and we should take this into account.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
In local testing (with KASAN and other options enabled), I've seen a stack
depth of 23928 bytes while booting to a prompt with an Ubuntu 14.04 filesystem
mounted over NFS. Without KASAN (but with other debug options enabled), this
was 7992 bytes.
I wonder if we want to go for 4x rather than 2x...
Thanks,
Mark.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
index 3585a5e..f7c4d21 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
@@ -95,16 +95,19 @@
#define KERNEL_END _end
/*
- * The size of the KASAN shadow region. This should be 1/8th of the
- * size of the entire kernel virtual address space.
+ * KASAN requires 1/8th of the kernel virtual address space for the shadow
+ * region. KASAN can bloat the stack significantly, so double the (minimum)
+ * stack size when KASAN is in use.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
#define KASAN_SHADOW_SIZE (UL(1) << (VA_BITS - 3))
+#define KASAN_THREAD_SHIFT 1
#else
#define KASAN_SHADOW_SIZE (0)
+#define KASAN_THREAD_SHIFT 0
#endif
-#define MIN_THREAD_SHIFT 14
+#define MIN_THREAD_SHIFT (14 + KASAN_THREAD_SHIFT)
/*
* VMAP'd stacks are allocated@page granularity, so we must ensure that such
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-03 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 17:25 Mark Rutland [this message]
2017-10-04 11:31 ` [PATCH] arm64: Use larger stacks when KASAN is selected Catalin Marinas
2017-10-04 11:39 ` Mark Rutland
2017-10-05 15:11 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507051546-11677-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).