[PATCH v5 02/12] mmc: mediatek: add support of mt2701/mt2712

[ck.hu@mediatek.com (CK Hu)]

Hi, Matthias:

On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 09:49 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 10/15/2017 10:26 AM, CK Hu wrote:
> > Hi, Chaotian:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 10:41 +0800, Chaotian Jing wrote:
> >> mt2701/mt2712 has 12bit clock div, which is not compatible with
> >> mt8135/mt8173. and, some additional features will be added in
> >> mt2701/mt2712, so that need distinguish it by comatibale name.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >>   1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> >> index 267f7ab..643c795 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> [...]
> >> @@ -350,6 +358,31 @@ struct msdc_host {
> >>   	struct msdc_tune_para saved_tune_para; /* tune result of CMD21/CMD19 */
> >>   };
> >>   
> >> +static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8135_compat = {
> >> +	.clk_div_bits = 8,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8173_compat = {
> >> +	.clk_div_bits = 8,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2701_compat = {
> >> +	.clk_div_bits = 12,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2712_compat = {
> >> +	.clk_div_bits = 12,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static const struct of_device_id msdc_of_ids[] = {
> >> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8135-mmc", .data = &mt8135_compat},
> >> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-mmc", .data = &mt8173_compat},
> > 
> > Because mt8135_compat is equal to mt8173_compat, so I think the
> > compatible of "mediatek,mt8173-mmc" is redundant. You could just keep
> > compatible of "mediatek,mt8135-mmc" in driver, and use
> > "mediatek,mt8135-mmc" for both mt8135.dtsi and mt8173.dtsi.
> > 
> 
> Well thing is, that in the follow-up patches, new data types get added to the 
> different compat structures and in the end all four a different.

You are right, these modification are necessary. If so, adding
"mediatek,mt8173-mmc" in the patch of "add support of mt2701/mt2712"
looks irrelevant. Maybe the title should be modified as "add support of
mt8173/mt2701/mt2712" or move mt8173 part to another patch.

Regards,
CK

> 
> >> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-mmc", .data = &mt2701_compat},
> >> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-mmc", .data = &mt2712_compat},
> > 
> > Ditto.
> > 
> 
> Same here.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias