[PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible

Pavel Machek
2014-07-11T19:31:44Z

On Wed 2014-06-18 20:59:08, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 09:09:58PM +0200, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 21:01:09 Russell King - ARM Linux
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:54:24PM +0200, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > > > Machine name from board description is some generic name on
> > > > DT kernel. DT provides machine name property which is
> > > > specific for board, so use it instead generic one when
> > > > possible.
> > >
> > > http://archive.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20130726.132850
> > > .53d47576.en.html
> > >
> > > "If userspace wants to get at the DT information about a
> > > platform, we already have ways that can happen already - we
> > > export the DT stuff so that kexec's tools can get at it."
> >
> > Userspace application does not know that kernel using DT. And
> > also it does not want to get DT information. Only board/machine
> > name. So existing applications stop working after migration to
> > DT. And because legacy board boot code (without DT) is going to
> > be removed for ARM in near future this will permanently break
> > existing applications.
>
> We're already breaking the userspace API through moving to DT, because
> all the device names in /sys/devices are changing. Userspace is going
> to have to cope with change as we move towards DT. This is just
> another aspect of moving towards DT, and one which userspace is going
> to have to deal with.

You don't _have_ to break /proc/cpuinfo. No, "DT breaks stuff" should
not be reason to "break more stuff". (Actually, I'm not aware of
anything DT would have to break.)

Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html