From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (Andy Shevchenko) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:32:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] [v4] pinctrl: qcom: qdf2xxx: add support for new ACPI HID QCOM8002 In-Reply-To: References: <1512170904-4749-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> <1512170904-4749-5-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> <1513073105.25007.618.camel@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <1513175535.7000.10.camel@linux.intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 14:17 -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 12/12/2017 04:05 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > +static const struct acpi_device_id qdf2xxx_acpi_ids[] = { > > > + {"QCOM8001", QDF2XXX_V1}, > > > + {"QCOM8002", QDF2XXX_V2}, > > > + {}, > > > +}; > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, qdf2xxx_acpi_ids); > > > > > > + const struct acpi_device_id *id = > > > + acpi_match_device(qdf2xxx_acpi_ids, &pdev->dev); > > > > JFYI: there is no need to move IDs like this. > > Use members of struct device_driver wisely. > > I have to move it, otherwise I get: > > drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-qdf2xxx.c:49:21: error: > 'qdf2xxx_acpi_ids' > undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean > 'qdf2xxx_pinctrl'? > > I reference the structure in qdf2xxx_pinctrl_probe(). Please, read my comment again. The key part of the phrase: "Use members of struct device_driver" So, do not move the IDs. There are examples in the kernel how to access it. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy