From: ryder.lee@mediatek.com (Ryder Lee)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: Mediatek: clear irq status after irq dispathed to avoid reentry
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 11:08:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1513739295.18782.1.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513738334-26213-1-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
On Wed, 2017-12-20 at 10:52 +0800, honghui.zhang at mediatek.com wrote:
> From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
>
> There maybe a same irq reentry scenario after irq received in current
> irq handle flow:
> EP device PCIe host driver EP driver
> 1. issue an irq
> 2. received irq
> 3. clear irq status
> 4. dispatch irq
> 5. clear irq source
> The irq status was not successfully cleared at step 2 since the irq
> source was not cleared yet. So the PCIe host driver may receive the
> same irq after step 5. Then there's an irq reentry occurred.
> Even worse, if the reentry irq was not an irq that EP driver expected,
> it may not handle the irq. Then we may run into the dead loop from
> step 2 to step 4.
> Clear the irq status after irq have been dispatched to avoid the irq
> reentry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c
> index db93efd..3248771 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c
> @@ -605,11 +605,11 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
>
> while ((status = readl(port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS)) & INTX_MASK) {
> for_each_set_bit_from(bit, &status, PCI_NUM_INTX + INTX_SHIFT) {
> - /* Clear the INTx */
> - writel(1 << bit, port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS);
> virq = irq_find_mapping(port->irq_domain,
> bit - INTX_SHIFT);
> generic_handle_irq(virq);
> + /* Clear the INTx */
> + writel(1 << bit, port->base + PCIE_INT_STATUS);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -619,10 +619,10 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_pcie_intr_handler(int irq, void *data)
>
> while ((imsi_status = readl(port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS))) {
> for_each_set_bit(bit, &imsi_status, MTK_MSI_IRQS_NUM) {
> - /* Clear the MSI */
> - writel(1 << bit, port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS);
> virq = irq_find_mapping(port->msi_domain, bit);
> generic_handle_irq(virq);
> + /* Clear the MSI */
> + writel(1 << bit, port->base + PCIE_IMSI_STATUS);
> }
> }
> /* Clear MSI interrupt status */
Acked-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-20 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-20 2:52 [PATCH] PCI: Mediatek: clear irq status after irq dispathed to avoid reentry honghui.zhang at mediatek.com
2017-12-20 3:08 ` Ryder Lee [this message]
2017-12-21 0:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-12-21 1:37 ` Honghui Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1513739295.18782.1.camel@mtkswgap22 \
--to=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox