From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (Andy Shevchenko) Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 18:04:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] [v6] pinctrl: qcom: qdf2xxx: add support for new ACPI HID QCOM8002 In-Reply-To: <8e985f68-5887-b0d5-8c45-e22b5d8f60cf@codeaurora.org> References: <6ca3b4a6-90b9-0481-beb8-29a95c86f07c@codeaurora.org> <615426d4-7c46-9671-87ef-790fb5733385@codeaurora.org> <20171219023935.GA17456@codeaurora.org> <735d4316-9b18-2903-aabd-46ead1db5233@codeaurora.org> <20171220022626.GH7997@codeaurora.org> <20171220081556.GA30524@codeaurora.org> <20171221003947.GJ7997@codeaurora.org> <38463c81-eeab-85dc-d197-6081ce1d1130@codeaurora.org> <20171222014633.GD7997@codeaurora.org> <8e985f68-5887-b0d5-8c45-e22b5d8f60cf@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <1515081875.7000.683.camel@linux.intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2018-01-04 at 09:46 -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 12/21/2017 07:46 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > Maybe future HIDs could follow the DT design and then we can look > > for the same device property name in both firmwares. > > DSDs generally don't have the vendor prefix that DT properties do. There are more means to check hardware revisions: HID - Hardware ID CID - Compatible ID UID - Unique ID (good to distinguish instances of the same device on the board) _HRV - Hardware Revision (6.1.6 describes this one) Everything is described in the spec. Does anybody care to read? P.S. More I reading this thread more I become thinking that people screw ACPI use in many ways... -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy