From: ryder.lee@mediatek.com (Ryder Lee)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] Mediatek: 32-bit DT update for v4.15
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:12:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515489147.11551.39.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1509846112.26038.22.camel@mtkswgap22>
On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 16:21 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 10:40 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:37 AM, Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> >> This should have the exact same effect as what you have in your tree,
> >> but if that works,
> >> we can merge that version and try to figure out why the kernel thinks
> >> they are different.
> >
> > I've tried this approach by using the 4-ports network card and got the
> > result:
> > pcieport 0000:00:01.0: assign IRQ: got 220
> > pcieport 0000:00:01.0: assigning IRQ 220
> > pcieport 0000:00:01.0: enabling device (0140 -> 0142)
> > pcieport 0000:00:01.0: enabling bus mastering
> > pcieport 0000:00:01.0: Signaling PME with IRQ 220
> > ....
> > igb 0000:01:00.0: assign IRQ: got 221
> > igb 0000:01:00.0: assigning IRQ 221
> > igb 0000:01:00.1: assign IRQ: got 221
> > igb 0000:01:00.1: assigning IRQ 221
> > igb 0000:01:00.2: assign IRQ: got 221
> > igb 0000:01:00.2: assigning IRQ 221
> > igb 0000:01:00.3: assign IRQ: got 221
> > igb 0000:01:00.3: assigning IRQ 221
> >
> > I think slot 1 should share its IRQ (220) with every device in the
> > hierarchy below this root port.
>
> Agreed, that is what I expected, too. I've looked at the of_pci_irq.c
> in more detail but couldn't come up with what happened. Can you
> try running with this patch or something like that to figure out where
> it takes the wrong turn?
>
> https://pastebin.com/MrMzwcmw
>
Hi Arnd,
I guess the problem is the first device attached to downstream side of a
link must be device 0 - it means that the 'slot' portion of pdev->devfn
should be 0 when PCIe enumeration. That's why we always mismatch to
interrupt-map = <0x0000 0 0 ... GIC_SPI 193 ...>
However, if we want to list all four interrupts for each slot, that
could work if fallback to device tree parsing:
https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.15-rc7/source/drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c#L89
Then replace 'pdev->devfn' with 'of_pci_get_devfn(out_irq->np)'
But I still not sure the proper way to solve it.
Ryder.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-09 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-22 22:06 [GIT PULL] Mediatek: 32-bit DT update for v4.15 Matthias Brugger
2017-10-30 12:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-10-31 4:19 ` Ryder Lee
2017-11-02 11:47 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-11-02 16:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-11-02 18:47 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-11-02 21:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-11-03 1:37 ` Ryder Lee
2017-11-03 9:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-11-03 11:52 ` Ryder Lee
2017-11-03 15:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-11-05 1:41 ` Ryder Lee
2018-01-09 9:12 ` Ryder Lee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1515489147.11551.39.camel@mtkswgap22 \
--to=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox