From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 03/16] iommu/exynos: fix page table maintenance
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 15:54:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516548.d7oQuzQS7g@amdc1227> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002701ce941a$eecebdb0$cc6c3910$@samsung.com>
On Thursday 08 of August 2013 18:37:43 Cho KyongHo wrote:
> This prevents allocating lv2 page table for the lv1 page table entry
^ What this is this this about? :)
> that already has 1MB page mapping. In addition, changed to BUG_ON
> instead of returning -EADDRINUSE.
The change mentioned in last sentence should be a separate patch.
> Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c | 68
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 files changed, 40
> insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> index d545a25..d90e6fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
> @@ -52,11 +52,11 @@
> #define lv2ent_large(pent) ((*(pent) & 3) == 1)
>
> #define section_phys(sent) (*(sent) & SECT_MASK)
> -#define section_offs(iova) ((iova) & 0xFFFFF)
> +#define section_offs(iova) ((iova) & ~SECT_MASK)
> #define lpage_phys(pent) (*(pent) & LPAGE_MASK)
> -#define lpage_offs(iova) ((iova) & 0xFFFF)
> +#define lpage_offs(iova) ((iova) & ~LPAGE_MASK)
> #define spage_phys(pent) (*(pent) & SPAGE_MASK)
> -#define spage_offs(iova) ((iova) & 0xFFF)
> +#define spage_offs(iova) ((iova) & ~SPAGE_MASK)
>
> #define lv1ent_offset(iova) ((iova) >> SECT_ORDER)
> #define lv2ent_offset(iova) (((iova) & 0xFF000) >> SPAGE_ORDER)
> @@ -856,13 +856,15 @@ finish:
> static unsigned long *alloc_lv2entry(unsigned long *sent, unsigned long
> iova, short *pgcounter)
> {
> + BUG_ON(lv1ent_section(sent));
Is this condition really a critical one, to the point that the system
should not continue execution?
> +
> if (lv1ent_fault(sent)) {
> unsigned long *pent;
>
> pent = kzalloc(LV2TABLE_SIZE, GFP_ATOMIC);
> BUG_ON((unsigned long)pent & (LV2TABLE_SIZE - 1));
> if (!pent)
> - return NULL;
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> *sent = mk_lv1ent_page(__pa(pent));
> *pgcounter = NUM_LV2ENTRIES;
> @@ -875,15 +877,11 @@ static unsigned long *alloc_lv2entry(unsigned long
> *sent, unsigned long iova,
>
> static int lv1set_section(unsigned long *sent, phys_addr_t paddr, short
> *pgcnt) {
> - if (lv1ent_section(sent))
> - return -EADDRINUSE;
> + BUG_ON(lv1ent_section(sent));
Ditto.
> if (lv1ent_page(sent)) {
> - if (*pgcnt != NUM_LV2ENTRIES)
> - return -EADDRINUSE;
> -
> + BUG_ON(*pgcnt != NUM_LV2ENTRIES);
Ditto.
> kfree(page_entry(sent, 0));
> -
> *pgcnt = 0;
> }
>
> @@ -894,24 +892,24 @@ static int lv1set_section(unsigned long *sent,
> phys_addr_t paddr, short *pgcnt) return 0;
> }
>
> +static void clear_page_table(unsigned long *ent, int n)
> +{
> + if (n > 0)
> + memset(ent, 0, sizeof(*ent) * n);
> +}
I don't see the point of creating this function. It seems to be used only
once, in addition with a constant as n, so the check for n > 0 is
unnecessary.
And even if there is a need for this change, it should be done in separate
patch, as this one is not about stylistic changes, but fixing page table
maintenance (at least based on your commit message).
> static int lv2set_page(unsigned long *pent, phys_addr_t paddr, size_t
> size, short *pgcnt)
> {
> if (size == SPAGE_SIZE) {
> - if (!lv2ent_fault(pent))
> - return -EADDRINUSE;
> -
> + BUG_ON(!lv2ent_fault(pent));
Ditto.
> *pent = mk_lv2ent_spage(paddr);
> pgtable_flush(pent, pent + 1);
> *pgcnt -= 1;
> } else { /* size == LPAGE_SIZE */
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < SPAGES_PER_LPAGE; i++, pent++) {
> - if (!lv2ent_fault(pent)) {
> - memset(pent, 0, sizeof(*pent) * i);
> - return -EADDRINUSE;
> - }
> -
> + BUG_ON(!lv2ent_fault(pent));
Ditto.
> *pent = mk_lv2ent_lpage(paddr);
> }
> pgtable_flush(pent - SPAGES_PER_LPAGE, pent);
> @@ -944,17 +942,16 @@ static int exynos_iommu_map(struct iommu_domain
> *domain, unsigned long iova, pent = alloc_lv2entry(entry, iova,
> &priv->lv2entcnt[lv1ent_offset(iova)]);
>
> - if (!pent)
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> + if (IS_ERR(pent))
> + ret = PTR_ERR(pent);
> else
> ret = lv2set_page(pent, paddr, size,
> &priv->lv2entcnt[lv1ent_offset(iova)]);
> }
>
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_debug("%s: Failed to map iova 0x%lx/0x%x bytes\n",
> - __func__, iova, size);
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("%s: Failed(%d) to map 0x%#x bytes @ %#lx\n",
> + __func__, ret, size, iova);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->pgtablelock, flags);
>
> @@ -968,6 +965,7 @@ static size_t exynos_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain
> *domain, struct sysmmu_drvdata *data;
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned long *ent;
> + size_t err_pgsize;
>
> BUG_ON(priv->pgtable == NULL);
>
> @@ -976,7 +974,10 @@ static size_t exynos_iommu_unmap(struct iommu_domain
> *domain, ent = section_entry(priv->pgtable, iova);
>
> if (lv1ent_section(ent)) {
> - BUG_ON(size < SECT_SIZE);
> + if (WARN_ON(size < SECT_SIZE)) {
> + err_pgsize = SECT_SIZE;
> + goto err;
> + }
>
> *ent = 0;
> pgtable_flush(ent, ent + 1);
> @@ -1008,9 +1009,12 @@ static size_t exynos_iommu_unmap(struct
> iommu_domain *domain, }
>
> /* lv1ent_large(ent) == true here */
> - BUG_ON(size < LPAGE_SIZE);
> + if (WARN_ON(size < LPAGE_SIZE)) {
> + err_pgsize = LPAGE_SIZE;
> + goto err;
> + }
>
> - memset(ent, 0, sizeof(*ent) * SPAGES_PER_LPAGE);
> + clear_page_table(ent, SPAGES_PER_LPAGE);
This seems to be the only use of the introduced clear_page_table()
function. Is there a need to replace the memset with it?
> pgtable_flush(ent, ent + SPAGES_PER_LPAGE);
>
> size = LPAGE_SIZE;
> @@ -1023,8 +1027,16 @@ done:
> sysmmu_tlb_invalidate_entry(data->dev, iova);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
>
> -
> return size;
> +err:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->pgtablelock, flags);
> +
> + pr_err("%s: Failed due to size(%#x) @ %#lx is"\
> + " smaller than page size %#x\n",
> + __func__, size, iova, err_pgsize);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
nit: Stray blank line.
Best regards,
Tomasz
> }
>
> static phys_addr_t exynos_iommu_iova_to_phys(struct iommu_domain
> *domain,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-08 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-08 9:37 [PATCH v9 03/16] iommu/exynos: fix page table maintenance Cho KyongHo
2013-08-08 13:54 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-08-08 18:28 ` Grant Grundler
2013-08-14 10:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2013-08-14 20:54 ` Grant Grundler
2013-08-16 11:17 ` Cho KyongHo
2013-08-09 4:15 ` Cho KyongHo
2013-08-09 7:47 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-09 8:33 ` Cho KyongHo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516548.d7oQuzQS7g@amdc1227 \
--to=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox