From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] clk: fractional-divider: fix up the fractional clk's jitter
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:05:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1517147.8QBNcir4nx@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499395943-19516-1-git-send-email-zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Hi Elaine,
Am Freitag, 7. Juli 2017, 10:52:23 CEST schrieb Elaine Zhang:
> add clk_fractional_divider_special_ops for rockchip specific requirements,
> fractional divider must set that denominator is 20 times larger than
> numerator to generate precise clock frequency.
> Otherwise the CLK jitter is very big, poor quality of the clock signal.
>
> RK document description:
> 3.1.9 Fractional divider usage
> To get specific frequency, clocks of I2S, SPDIF, UARTcan be generated by
> fractional divider. Generally you must set that denominator is 20 times
> larger than numerator to generate precise clock frequency. So the
> fractional divider applies only to generate low frequency clock like
> I2S, UART.igned-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/rockchip/clk.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c
> index aab904618eb6..3107b33327f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,38 @@ struct clk_hw *clk_hw_register_fractional_divider(struct device *dev,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_hw_register_fractional_divider);
>
> +static long clk_fd_round_rate_special(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *parent_rate)
> +{
this obviously still encodes Rockchip-specific things into the generic
fractional-divider driver. And it's of course only special for Rockchip
fractional dividers and will end it chaos if every implementation wants
to add a "special" function there.
Did you have a look at the patch I added to the last mail (for real this time)?
Heiko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-10 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-07 2:52 [PATCH v2] clk: fractional-divider: fix up the fractional clk's jitter Elaine Zhang
2017-07-10 11:05 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2017-07-13 7:53 ` Elaine Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1517147.8QBNcir4nx@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).