From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (Andy Shevchenko) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:01:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v1] ARM: pxa/raumfeld: use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32() directly In-Reply-To: <20180122125529.6291-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <20180122125529.6291-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <1517238114.7000.1299.camel@linux.intel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 14:55 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Instead of using PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER() with explicitly supplied > type, > use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32() dedicated macro. > > It will help modify internals of built-in device properties API. > > No functional change intended. > Can someone apply that, or at least Ack? It's needed as a prerequisite to fix one bug in device property core API. > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > --- > arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c b/arch/arm/mach- > pxa/raumfeld.c > index 9d662fed03ec..0bf5419a9d10 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c > @@ -378,9 +378,9 @@ static struct gpiod_lookup_table > raumfeld_rotary_gpios_table = { > }; > > static const struct property_entry raumfeld_rotary_properties[] > __initconst = { > - PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER("rotary-encoder,steps-per-period", > u32, 24), > - PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER("linux,axis", > u32, REL_X), > - PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER("rotary-encoder,relative_axis", > u32, 1), > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("rotary-encoder,steps-per-period", 24), > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("linux,axis", REL_X), > + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("rotary-encoder,relative_axis", 1), > { }, > }; > -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy