From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: l.stach@pengutronix.de (Lucas Stach) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 12:34:55 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add Freescale pin controllers In-Reply-To: <20180212112255.u333xb676kfmi63f@sapphire.tkos.co.il> References: <20180210153204.12728-1-stefan@agner.ch> <1518432502.2744.5.camel@pengutronix.de> <20180212112255.u333xb676kfmi63f@sapphire.tkos.co.il> Message-ID: <1518435295.2744.7.camel@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am Montag, den 12.02.2018, 13:22 +0200 schrieb Baruch Siach: > Hi Lucas, > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:48:22AM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 10.02.2018, 16:32 +0100 schrieb Stefan Agner: > > > Add Dong Aisheng, Fabio Estevam, Shawn Guo and myself as > > > maintainer > > > and Sascha as reviewer. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner > > > --- > > > ?MAINTAINERS | 11 +++++++++++ > > > ?1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > index 82ad0eabce4f..fb672dfc519d 100644 > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > @@ -10768,6 +10768,17 @@ L: linux-gpio at vger.kernel.org > > > ?S: Supported > > > ?F: drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.* > > > ? > > > +PIN CONTROLLER - FREESCALE > > > +M: Dong Aisheng > > > +M: Fabio Estevam > > > +M: Shawn Guo > > > +M: Stefan Agner > > > +R: Sascha Hauer > > > > I'm fine with the patch, but it might make sense to clarify this a > > bit: > > the kernel@ address is really the whole Pengutronix kernel team, > > not > > just Sascha. Using this address is totally fine if you expect > > comments > > on patches, as it gives them a quite wide exposure inside of PTX. > > Of the 5 mentions of kernel at pengutronix.de in MAINTAINERS as of > v4.16-rc1,? > three name Sascha, and two name Uwe. Would you like to also clarify > those? I think it fine to keep the names of the individual people where they maintain stuff, as this is usually bound to a single person (where kernel@ address is only used for the exposure benefits), but I think it makes less sense for the reviewer role. Regards, Lucas