[resend, PATCH v1] ARM: pxa/raumfeld: use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32() directly

[resend, PATCH v1] ARM: pxa/raumfeld: use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32() directly

[Andy Shevchenko]

Instead of using PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER() with explicitly supplied type,
use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32() dedicated macro.

It will help modify internals of built-in device properties API.

No functional change intended.

Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
- resend
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
index 9d662fed03ec..0bf5419a9d10 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
@@ -378,9 +378,9 @@ static struct gpiod_lookup_table raumfeld_rotary_gpios_table = {
 };
 
 static const struct property_entry raumfeld_rotary_properties[] __initconst = {
-	PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER("rotary-encoder,steps-per-period", u32, 24),
-	PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER("linux,axis",			  u32, REL_X),
-	PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER("rotary-encoder,relative_axis",	  u32, 1),
+	PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("rotary-encoder,steps-per-period", 24),
+	PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("linux,axis",		      REL_X),
+	PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("rotary-encoder,relative_axis",    1),
 	{ },
 };
 
-- 
2.15.1

[resend, PATCH v1] ARM: pxa/raumfeld: use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32() directly

[Robert Jarzmik]

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> writes:

> Instead of using PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER() with explicitly supplied type,
> use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32() dedicated macro.
>
> It will help modify internals of built-in device properties API.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Applied to pxa/for-next branch, thanks.

Cheers.

--
Robert

[resend, PATCH v1] ARM: pxa/raumfeld: use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32() directly

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 19:04 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> writes:
> 
> > Instead of using PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER() with explicitly supplied
> > type,
> > use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32() dedicated macro.
> > 
> > It will help modify internals of built-in device properties API.
> > 
> > No functional change intended.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Applied to pxa/for-next branch, thanks.

Can't find either in linux-next, or in your tree on Github.
Am I looking at wrong locations?

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

[resend, PATCH v1] ARM: pxa/raumfeld: use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32() directly

[Robert Jarzmik]

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> writes:

> On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 19:04 +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Instead of using PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER() with explicitly supplied
>> > type,
>> > use PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32() dedicated macro.
>> > 
>> > It will help modify internals of built-in device properties API.
>> > 
>> > No functional change intended.
>> > 
>> > Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
>> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>> 
>> Applied to pxa/for-next branch, thanks.
>
> Can't find either in linux-next, or in your tree on Github.
> Am I looking at wrong locations?
My server on github was not synchronized, it is now :0
My next pull request is around -rc5.

Cheers.

-- 
Robert