public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sean.wang@mediatek.com (Sean Wang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] pwm: mediatek: fix up PWM4 and PWM5 malfunction on MT7623
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 06:34:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520030090.8089.186.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180302105719.GC27178@ulmo>

On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 11:57 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:19:12PM +0800, sean.wang at mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Since the offset for both registers, PWMDWIDTH and PWMTHRES, used to
> > control PWM4 or PWM5 are distinct from the other PWMs, whose wrong
> > programming on PWM hardware causes waveform cannot be output as expected.
> > Thus, the patch adds the extra condition for fixing up the weird case to
> > let PWM4 or PWM5 able to work on MT7623.
> > 
> > v1 -> v2: use pwm45_fixup naming instead of pwm45_quirk
> > v2 -> v3: add more tags for Reviewed-by, Fixes, and Cc stable
> > 
> > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: caf065f8fd58 ("pwm: Add MediaTek PWM support")
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Zhi Mao <zhi.mao@mediatek.com>
> > Cc: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
> > Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c
> [...]
> > @@ -151,9 +156,18 @@ static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (pc->soc->pwm45_fixup && pwm->hwpwm > 2) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * PWM[4,5] has distinct offset for PWMDWIDTH and PWMTHRES
> > +		 * from the other PWMs on MT7623.
> > +		 */
> > +		reg_width = PWM45DWIDTH_FIXUP;
> > +		reg_thres = PWM45THRES_FIXUP;
> > +	}
> 
> I don't understand this. According to the condition above the above
> would also use the PWM[4,5] "fixup" register offsets with PWM[3]. Should
> the condition be pwm->hwpwm > 3?
> 
> Thierry


PWM[4,5] are the naming specified in datasheet and kept it as is here
and driver or userspace would use index 3 and 4 to have a reference to
them respectively.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-02 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-01  8:19 [PATCH v3] pwm: mediatek: fix up PWM4 and PWM5 malfunction on MT7623 sean.wang at mediatek.com
2018-03-02 10:57 ` Thierry Reding
2018-03-02 22:34   ` Sean Wang [this message]
2018-03-27 22:30     ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1520030090.8089.186.camel@mtkswgap22 \
    --to=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox