From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] io: prevent compiler reordering on the default writeX() implementation
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:58:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1522425494-2916-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> (raw)
The default implementation of mapping writeX() to __raw_writeX() is wrong.
writeX() has stronger ordering semantics. Compiler is allowed to reorder
__raw_writeX().
In the abscence of a write barrier or when using a strongly ordered
architecture, writeX() should at least have a compiler barrier in
it to prevent commpiler from clobbering the execution order.
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
include/asm-generic/io.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h
index b4531e3..e8c2078 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/io.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ static inline u64 readq(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
#define writeb writeb
static inline void writeb(u8 value, volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
+ barrier();
__raw_writeb(value, addr);
}
#endif
@@ -152,6 +153,7 @@ static inline void writeb(u8 value, volatile void __iomem *addr)
#define writew writew
static inline void writew(u16 value, volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
+ barrier();
__raw_writew(cpu_to_le16(value), addr);
}
#endif
@@ -160,6 +162,7 @@ static inline void writew(u16 value, volatile void __iomem *addr)
#define writel writel
static inline void writel(u32 value, volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
+ barrier();
__raw_writel(__cpu_to_le32(value), addr);
}
#endif
@@ -169,6 +172,7 @@ static inline void writel(u32 value, volatile void __iomem *addr)
#define writeq writeq
static inline void writeq(u64 value, volatile void __iomem *addr)
{
+ barrier();
__raw_writeq(__cpu_to_le64(value), addr);
}
#endif
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-03-30 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-30 15:58 Sinan Kaya [this message]
2018-03-30 15:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] io: prevent compiler reordering on the default readX() implementation Sinan Kaya
2018-04-03 10:49 ` Mark Rutland
2018-04-03 11:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-03 12:44 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-03 12:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-03 13:06 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-03 22:29 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-04-04 15:52 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-04 15:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-04 15:57 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-04 17:48 ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-04 19:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-05 0:06 ` Sinan Kaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1522425494-2916-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).