From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:09:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524664.UCV47tfIRU@flatron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGm_ybiVZOPBJJ0bYX33wafn1So6aqSAnk7myXZ+Z+RfLBeBQw@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 21 of June 2013 10:18:01 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
> Hi Mr. Kim,
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar
>
> <yadi.brar01@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
wrote:
> >> Hi Yadwinder, Vikas,
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 11 of June 2013 15:01:05 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
> >>> This patch series does the following:
> >>> 1) Unifies the clk strutures and registration function used for
> >>> PLL35xx>>>
> >>> & PLL36xx, to factor out possible common code.
> >>>
> >>> 2) Defines a common rate_table which will contain recommended p, m,
> >>> s
> >>>
> >>> and k values for supported rates that needs to be changed for
> >>> changing
> >>> corresponding PLL's rate
> >>>
> >>> 3) Adds set_rate() and round_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx
> >>>
> >>> changes since v6:
> >>> - Splited the patch adding samsung_clk_register_pll() into
> >>> definition
> >>> addition, SoC specific migration and cleanup patches.
> >>> - Addressed some NIT comments.
> >>
> >> This version looks good to me. Thanks for your work on improving this
> >> series again!
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
>
> Can you apply this series..
I think we need at least Mike's (clk subsystem maintainer) ACK here.
Mike, do you have any objections?
Best regards,
Tomasz
> > Thanks for helping to improve this series.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yadwinder
> >
> >> Best regards,
> >> Tomasz
> >>
> >>> changes since v5:
> >>> - Corrected to use rate table as specified in UM for
> >>> exynos5250 epll.
> >>> - Took care of exynos5420 as well, as new exynos5420 clk
> >>> driver came in
> >>> while rebasing on latest Kgene's for-next.
> >>>
> >>> Since we spilted 1st patch into 2 different patches,
> >>> can we expect "reviewed-by" again for the same?
> >>>
> >>> changes since v4:
> >>> - Defined common samsung samsung_clk_register_pll() to
> >>> register a list
> >>> of PLL and used a struct samsung_pll_clock for passing
> >>> intialisation
> >>> data instead of passing as arguments. Now passing LOCK as well
> >>> as CON0
> >>> offset as intialisation data.
> >>> - Calculated length of rate table while registering PLL
> >>> instead of
> >>> getting it as intialisation data.
> >>>
> >>> changes since v3:
> >>> - Used __clk_lookup() instead of adding alias for mout_vpllsrc
> >>> - Added check for changing only M value in
> >>> samsung_pll36xx_set_rate()
> >>> - Modified samsung_pll35xx_mp_change() &
> >>> samsung_pll35xx_set_rate()
> >>> to improve readabilty.
> >>> - Made the input rate_table as __init_data which is to be
> >>> provided
> >>
> >> while
> >>
> >>> registering PLL and made a copy of that table while registering, so
> >>> that if multiple tables are their, they can be freed after getting
> >>> the P, M, S, K setting values from required one.
> >>>
> >>> changes since v2:
> >>> - Added new patch to reorder the MUX registration for
> >>> mout_vpllsrc MUX
> >>> before the PLL registrations. And to add the alias for the
> >>> mout_vpllsrc
> >>>
> >>> MUX. - Added a check to confirm parent rate while registrating the
> >>> PLL
> >>> rate tables.
> >>>
> >>> changes since v1:
> >>> - removed sorting and bsearch
> >>> - modified the definition of struct "samsung_pll_rate_table"
> >>> - added generic round_rate()
> >>> - rectified the ops assignment for "rate table passed as NULL
> >>>
> >>> Is rebased on branch kgene's "for-next"
> >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> >>> /log/ ?h=for-next
> >>>
> >>> Vikas Sajjan (3):
> >>> clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL36xx
> >>> clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc
> >>> clk: samsung: Add EPLL and VPLL freq table for exynos5250 SoC
> >>>
> >>> Yadwinder Singh Brar (8):
> >>> clk: samsung: Introduce a common samsung_clk_pll struct
> >>> clk: samsung: Define a common samsung_clk_register_pll()
> >>> clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5250 to use common
> >>>
> >>> samsung_clk_register_pll()
> >>>
> >>> clk: samsung: Migrate exynos4 to use common
> >>>
> >>> samsung_clk_register_pll()
> >>>
> >>> clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5420 to use common
> >>>
> >>> samsung_clk_register_pll()
> >>>
> >>> clk: samsung: Remove unused pll registeration code for pll35xx and
> >>>
> >>> pll36xx
> >>>
> >>> clk: samsung: Add support to register rate_table for samsung plls
> >>> clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx
> >>>
> >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 40 +++--
> >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 101 +++++++++--
> >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 86 ++++++---
> >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 339
> >>>
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
> >>>
> >>> | 38 ++++-
> >>>
> >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h | 53 ++++++
> >>> 6 files changed, 519 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> >> linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to
> >> majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to
> > majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-21 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-11 9:31 [PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-11 9:31 ` [PATCH v7 01/11] clk: samsung: Introduce a common samsung_clk_pll struct Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-11 9:31 ` [PATCH v7 02/11] clk: samsung: Define a common samsung_clk_register_pll() Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-11 9:31 ` [PATCH v7 03/11] clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5250 to use " Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-11 9:31 ` [PATCH v7 04/11] clk: samsung: Migrate exynos4 " Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-11 9:31 ` [PATCH v7 05/11] clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5420 " Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-11 9:31 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] clk: samsung: Remove unused pll registeration code for pll35xx and pll36xx Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-11 9:31 ` [PATCH v7 07/11] clk: samsung: Add support to register rate_table for samsung plls Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-11 9:31 ` [PATCH v7 08/11] clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-11 9:31 ` [PATCH v7 09/11] clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL36xx Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-11 9:31 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-11 9:31 ` [PATCH v7 11/11] clk: samsung: Add EPLL and VPLL freq table for exynos5250 SoC Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-20 10:00 ` [PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs Tomasz Figa
2013-06-20 10:07 ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-06-21 4:48 ` Vikas Sajjan
2013-06-21 7:09 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-06-21 16:31 ` Mike Turquette
2013-06-24 15:02 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-24 19:02 ` Mike Turquette
2013-06-25 2:10 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-07-16 13:40 ` Yadwinder Singh Brar
2013-07-22 6:15 ` Vikas Sajjan
2013-07-23 1:26 ` Mike Turquette
2013-07-30 13:13 ` Vikas Sajjan
2013-08-02 21:33 ` Mike Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1524664.UCV47tfIRU@flatron \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).