From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ck.hu@mediatek.com (CK Hu) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:35:05 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 26/28] drm/mediatek: add DPI1/DSI1/DSI2/DSI3 in comp_init In-Reply-To: <1528687580-549-27-git-send-email-stu.hsieh@mediatek.com> References: <1528687580-549-1-git-send-email-stu.hsieh@mediatek.com> <1528687580-549-27-git-send-email-stu.hsieh@mediatek.com> Message-ID: <1528875305.30263.14.camel@mtksdaap41> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, Stu: On Mon, 2018-06-11 at 11:26 +0800, Stu Hsieh wrote: > This patch add components DPI1/DSI1/DSI2/DSI3 in comp_init. > Because the some parameter for these components initialized > in their driver. > > Signed-off-by: Stu Hsieh > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > index 22f4c72fa785..ff974d82a4a6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > @@ -278,7 +278,11 @@ int mtk_ddp_comp_init(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node, > > if (comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS || > comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0 || > + comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI1 || Why not move this modification to the patch 'add component DPI1'? > comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0 || > + comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI1 || > + comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI2 || Why not move this modification to the patch 'add component DSI2'? > + comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI3 || Why not move this modification to the patch 'add component DSI3'? Regards, CK > comp_id == DDP_COMPONENT_PWM0) { > comp->regs = NULL; > comp->clk = NULL;