From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 09/16] KVM: arm64: Allow ID registers to by dynamically read-as-zero
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:57:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1529593060-542-10-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1529593060-542-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
When a feature-dependent ID register is hidden from the guest, it
needs to exhibit read-as-zero behaviour as defined by the Arm
architecture, rather than appearing to be entirely absent.
This patch updates the ID register emulation logic to make use of
the new check_present() method to determine whether the register
should read as zero instead of yielding the host's sanitised
value. Because currently a false result from this method truncates
the trap call chain before the sysreg's emulate method() is called,
a flag is added to distinguish this special case, and helpers are
refactored appropriately.
This invloves some trivial updates to pass the vcpu pointer down
into the ID register emulation/access functions.
A new ID_SANITISED_IF() macro is defined for declaring
conditionally visible ID registers.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h | 11 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 31a351a..87d2468 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -987,11 +987,17 @@ static bool access_cntp_cval(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
}
/* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */
-static u64 read_id_reg(struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
+static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
{
u32 id = sys_reg((u32)r->Op0, (u32)r->Op1,
(u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2);
- u64 val = raz ? 0 : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+ u64 val;
+
+ if (raz || !sys_reg_present(vcpu, r))
+ val = 0;
+ else
+ val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
if (id == SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1) {
if (val & (0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_SVE_SHIFT))
@@ -1018,7 +1024,7 @@ static bool __access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (p->is_write)
return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
- p->regval = read_id_reg(r, raz);
+ p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
return true;
}
@@ -1047,16 +1053,18 @@ static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg);
* are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value
* to be changed.
*/
-static int __get_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
+static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
bool raz)
{
const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
- const u64 val = read_id_reg(rd, raz);
+ const u64 val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id);
}
-static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
+static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
bool raz)
{
const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
@@ -1068,7 +1076,7 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
return err;
/* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
- if (val != read_id_reg(rd, raz))
+ if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
@@ -1077,33 +1085,40 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
{
- return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false);
+ return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false);
}
static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
{
- return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false);
+ return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false);
}
static int get_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
{
- return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true);
+ return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true);
}
static int set_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
{
- return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true);
+ return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true);
}
/* sys_reg_desc initialiser for known cpufeature ID registers */
-#define ID_SANITISED(name) { \
+#define __ID_SANITISED(name) \
SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \
.access = access_id_reg, \
.get_user = get_id_reg, \
- .set_user = set_id_reg, \
+ .set_user = set_id_reg
+
+#define ID_SANITISED(name) { __ID_SANITISED(name) }
+
+#define ID_SANITISED_IF(name, check) { \
+ __ID_SANITISED(name), \
+ .check_present = check, \
+ .flags = SR_RAZ_IF_ABSENT, \
}
/*
@@ -1840,7 +1855,7 @@ static int emulate_cp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
r = find_reg(params, table, num);
- if (likely(r) && sys_reg_present(vcpu, r)) {
+ if (likely(r) && sys_reg_present_or_raz(vcpu, r)) {
perform_access(vcpu, params, r);
return 0;
}
@@ -2016,7 +2031,7 @@ static int emulate_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (!r)
r = find_reg(params, sys_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs));
- if (likely(r) && sys_reg_present(vcpu, r)) {
+ if (likely(r) && sys_reg_present_or_raz(vcpu, r)) {
perform_access(vcpu, params, r);
} else {
kvm_err("Unsupported guest sys_reg access at: %lx\n",
@@ -2313,7 +2328,7 @@ int kvm_arm_sys_reg_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg
if (!r)
return get_invariant_sys_reg(reg->id, uaddr);
- if (!sys_reg_present(vcpu, r))
+ if (!sys_reg_present_or_raz(vcpu, r))
return -ENOENT;
if (r->get_user)
@@ -2337,7 +2352,7 @@ int kvm_arm_sys_reg_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg
if (!r)
return set_invariant_sys_reg(reg->id, uaddr);
- if (!sys_reg_present(vcpu, r))
+ if (!sys_reg_present_or_raz(vcpu, r))
return -ENOENT;
if (r->set_user)
@@ -2408,7 +2423,7 @@ static int walk_one_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (!(rd->reg || rd->get_user))
return 0;
- if (!sys_reg_present(vcpu, rd))
+ if (!sys_reg_present_or_raz(vcpu, rd))
return 0;
if (!copy_reg_to_user(rd, uind))
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
index dfbb342..304928f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
@@ -66,14 +66,25 @@ struct sys_reg_desc {
const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr);
bool (*check_present)(const struct kvm_vcpu *vpcu,
const struct sys_reg_desc *rd);
+
+ /* OR of SR_* flags */
+ unsigned int flags;
};
+#define SR_RAZ_IF_ABSENT (1 << 0)
+
static inline bool sys_reg_present(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
{
return likely(!rd->check_present) || rd->check_present(vcpu, rd);
}
+static inline bool sys_reg_present_or_raz(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
+{
+ return sys_reg_present(vcpu, rd) || (rd->flags & SR_RAZ_IF_ABSENT);
+}
+
static inline void print_sys_reg_instr(const struct sys_reg_params *p)
{
/* Look, we even formatted it for you to paste into the table! */
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-21 14:57 [RFC PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: Initial support for SVE guests Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] arm64: fpsimd: Always set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on task state flush Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:07 ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Delete orphaned declaration for __fpsimd_enabled() Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:08 ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arm_num_regs() for easier maintenance Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:20 ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Add missing #include of <linux/bitmap.h> to kvm_host.h Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:21 ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] KVM: arm: Add arch init/uninit hooks Dave Martin
2018-07-06 10:02 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-09 15:15 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] arm64/sve: Determine virtualisation-friendly vector lengths Dave Martin
2018-07-06 13:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] arm64/sve: Enable SVE state tracking for non-task contexts Dave Martin
2018-07-25 13:58 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-25 14:39 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] KVM: arm64: Support dynamically hideable system registers Dave Martin
2018-07-25 14:12 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-25 14:36 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 15:41 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-26 12:53 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 19:20 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 8:33 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2018-07-25 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] KVM: arm64: Allow ID registers to by dynamically read-as-zero Alex Bennée
2018-08-06 13:03 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:09 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 19:35 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 9:11 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-08 9:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 14:03 ` Peter Maydell
2018-08-09 10:19 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control SVE visibility for the guest Dave Martin
2018-07-19 11:08 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:41 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 13:43 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:41 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 15:02 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:48 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] KVM: arm64/sve: System register context switch and access support Dave Martin
2018-07-19 11:11 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:45 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] KVM: arm64/sve: Context switch the SVE registers Dave Martin
2018-07-19 13:13 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:50 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 13:57 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:12 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-06 13:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:15 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 19:43 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 8:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] KVM: Allow 2048-bit register access via KVM_{GET, SET}_ONE_REG Dave Martin
2018-07-25 15:58 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-26 12:58 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-26 13:55 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-27 9:26 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] KVM: arm64/sve: Add SVE support to register access ioctl interface Dave Martin
2018-07-19 13:04 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:06 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 17:20 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-26 13:10 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-03 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-03 15:11 ` Andrew Jones
2018-08-03 15:38 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-06 13:25 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:17 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] KVM: arm64: Enumerate SVE register indices for KVM_GET_REG_LIST Dave Martin
2018-07-19 14:12 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:50 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] KVM: arm64/sve: Report and enable SVE API extensions for userspace Dave Martin
2018-07-19 14:59 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 15:27 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 16:52 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-26 13:18 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-06 13:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 20:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 8:30 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 15:24 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-26 13:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: Initial support for SVE guests Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 9:05 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:20 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 9:23 ` Peter Maydell
2018-07-06 10:11 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 10:14 ` Peter Maydell
2018-08-06 13:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:18 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1529593060-542-10-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).