linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 09/16] KVM: arm64: Allow ID registers to by dynamically read-as-zero
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:57:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1529593060-542-10-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1529593060-542-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

When a feature-dependent ID register is hidden from the guest, it
needs to exhibit read-as-zero behaviour as defined by the Arm
architecture, rather than appearing to be entirely absent.

This patch updates the ID register emulation logic to make use of
the new check_present() method to determine whether the register
should read as zero instead of yielding the host's sanitised
value.  Because currently a false result from this method truncates
the trap call chain before the sysreg's emulate method() is called,
a flag is added to distinguish this special case, and helpers are
refactored appropriately.

This invloves some trivial updates to pass the vcpu pointer down
into the ID register emulation/access functions.

A new ID_SANITISED_IF() macro is defined for declaring
conditionally visible ID registers.

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h | 11 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 31a351a..87d2468 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -987,11 +987,17 @@ static bool access_cntp_cval(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 /* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */
-static u64 read_id_reg(struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
+static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+		       struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
 {
 	u32 id = sys_reg((u32)r->Op0, (u32)r->Op1,
 			 (u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2);
-	u64 val = raz ? 0 : read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
+	u64 val;
+
+	if (raz || !sys_reg_present(vcpu, r))
+		val = 0;
+	else
+		val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id);
 
 	if (id == SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1) {
 		if (val & (0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_SVE_SHIFT))
@@ -1018,7 +1024,7 @@ static bool __access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (p->is_write)
 		return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
 
-	p->regval = read_id_reg(r, raz);
+	p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -1047,16 +1053,18 @@ static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg);
  * are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value
  * to be changed.
  */
-static int __get_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
+static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
 			bool raz)
 {
 	const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
-	const u64 val = read_id_reg(rd, raz);
+	const u64 val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
 
 	return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id);
 }
 
-static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
+static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
 			bool raz)
 {
 	const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
@@ -1068,7 +1076,7 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
 		return err;
 
 	/* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
-	if (val != read_id_reg(rd, raz))
+	if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1077,33 +1085,40 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
 static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 		      const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
 {
-	return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false);
+	return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false);
 }
 
 static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 		      const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
 {
-	return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false);
+	return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false);
 }
 
 static int get_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 			  const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
 {
-	return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true);
+	return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true);
 }
 
 static int set_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 			  const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
 {
-	return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true);
+	return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true);
 }
 
 /* sys_reg_desc initialiser for known cpufeature ID registers */
-#define ID_SANITISED(name) {			\
+#define __ID_SANITISED(name)			\
 	SYS_DESC(SYS_##name),			\
 	.access	= access_id_reg,		\
 	.get_user = get_id_reg,			\
-	.set_user = set_id_reg,			\
+	.set_user = set_id_reg
+
+#define ID_SANITISED(name) { __ID_SANITISED(name) }
+
+#define ID_SANITISED_IF(name, check) {		\
+	__ID_SANITISED(name),			\
+	.check_present = check,			\
+	.flags = SR_RAZ_IF_ABSENT,		\
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1840,7 +1855,7 @@ static int emulate_cp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	r = find_reg(params, table, num);
 
-	if (likely(r) && sys_reg_present(vcpu, r)) {
+	if (likely(r) && sys_reg_present_or_raz(vcpu, r)) {
 		perform_access(vcpu, params, r);
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -2016,7 +2031,7 @@ static int emulate_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (!r)
 		r = find_reg(params, sys_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(sys_reg_descs));
 
-	if (likely(r) && sys_reg_present(vcpu, r)) {
+	if (likely(r) && sys_reg_present_or_raz(vcpu, r)) {
 		perform_access(vcpu, params, r);
 	} else {
 		kvm_err("Unsupported guest sys_reg access at: %lx\n",
@@ -2313,7 +2328,7 @@ int kvm_arm_sys_reg_get_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg
 	if (!r)
 		return get_invariant_sys_reg(reg->id, uaddr);
 
-	if (!sys_reg_present(vcpu, r))
+	if (!sys_reg_present_or_raz(vcpu, r))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	if (r->get_user)
@@ -2337,7 +2352,7 @@ int kvm_arm_sys_reg_set_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg
 	if (!r)
 		return set_invariant_sys_reg(reg->id, uaddr);
 
-	if (!sys_reg_present(vcpu, r))
+	if (!sys_reg_present_or_raz(vcpu, r))
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	if (r->set_user)
@@ -2408,7 +2423,7 @@ static int walk_one_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (!(rd->reg || rd->get_user))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!sys_reg_present(vcpu, rd))
+	if (!sys_reg_present_or_raz(vcpu, rd))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (!copy_reg_to_user(rd, uind))
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
index dfbb342..304928f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
@@ -66,14 +66,25 @@ struct sys_reg_desc {
 			const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr);
 	bool (*check_present)(const struct kvm_vcpu *vpcu,
 			      const struct sys_reg_desc *rd);
+
+	/* OR of SR_* flags */
+	unsigned int flags;
 };
 
+#define SR_RAZ_IF_ABSENT	(1 << 0)
+
 static inline bool sys_reg_present(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				   const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
 {
 	return likely(!rd->check_present) || rd->check_present(vcpu, rd);
 }
 
+static inline bool sys_reg_present_or_raz(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+					  const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
+{
+	return sys_reg_present(vcpu, rd) || (rd->flags & SR_RAZ_IF_ABSENT);
+}
+
 static inline void print_sys_reg_instr(const struct sys_reg_params *p)
 {
 	/* Look, we even formatted it for you to paste into the table! */
-- 
2.1.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-21 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-21 14:57 [RFC PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: Initial support for SVE guests Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] arm64: fpsimd: Always set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on task state flush Dave Martin
2018-07-06  9:07   ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Delete orphaned declaration for __fpsimd_enabled() Dave Martin
2018-07-06  9:08   ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arm_num_regs() for easier maintenance Dave Martin
2018-07-06  9:20   ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Add missing #include of <linux/bitmap.h> to kvm_host.h Dave Martin
2018-07-06  9:21   ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] KVM: arm: Add arch init/uninit hooks Dave Martin
2018-07-06 10:02   ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-09 15:15     ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] arm64/sve: Determine virtualisation-friendly vector lengths Dave Martin
2018-07-06 13:20   ` Marc Zyngier
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] arm64/sve: Enable SVE state tracking for non-task contexts Dave Martin
2018-07-25 13:58   ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-25 14:39     ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] KVM: arm64: Support dynamically hideable system registers Dave Martin
2018-07-25 14:12   ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-25 14:36     ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 15:41       ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-26 12:53         ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 19:20   ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08  8:33     ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2018-07-25 15:46   ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] KVM: arm64: Allow ID registers to by dynamically read-as-zero Alex Bennée
2018-08-06 13:03   ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:09     ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 19:35       ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08  9:11         ` Dave Martin
2018-08-08  9:58           ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 14:03           ` Peter Maydell
2018-08-09 10:19             ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control SVE visibility for the guest Dave Martin
2018-07-19 11:08   ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:41     ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 13:43       ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:41         ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 15:02   ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:48     ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] KVM: arm64/sve: System register context switch and access support Dave Martin
2018-07-19 11:11   ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:45     ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] KVM: arm64/sve: Context switch the SVE registers Dave Martin
2018-07-19 13:13   ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:50     ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 13:57       ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:12         ` Dave Martin
2018-08-06 13:19   ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:15     ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 19:43       ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08  8:23         ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] KVM: Allow 2048-bit register access via KVM_{GET, SET}_ONE_REG Dave Martin
2018-07-25 15:58   ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-26 12:58     ` Dave Martin
2018-07-26 13:55       ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-27  9:26         ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] KVM: arm64/sve: Add SVE support to register access ioctl interface Dave Martin
2018-07-19 13:04   ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:06     ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 17:20       ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-26 13:10         ` Dave Martin
2018-08-03 14:57     ` Dave Martin
2018-08-03 15:11       ` Andrew Jones
2018-08-03 15:38         ` Dave Martin
2018-08-06 13:25   ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:17     ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] KVM: arm64: Enumerate SVE register indices for KVM_GET_REG_LIST Dave Martin
2018-07-19 14:12   ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:50     ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] KVM: arm64/sve: Report and enable SVE API extensions for userspace Dave Martin
2018-07-19 14:59   ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 15:27     ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 16:52       ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-26 13:18         ` Dave Martin
2018-08-06 13:41           ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:23             ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 20:08               ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08  8:30                 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 15:24   ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-26 13:23     ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06  8:22 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: Initial support for SVE guests Alex Bennée
2018-07-06  9:05   ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06  9:20     ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06  9:23       ` Peter Maydell
2018-07-06 10:11         ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 10:14           ` Peter Maydell
2018-08-06 13:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:18   ` Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1529593060-542-10-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).